3rd Gen JCW Opposite of the eMINI: F56 JCW GP

Discussion in '3rd Generation: 2014+ F54, F55, F56, F57, F60' started by Redbeard, Sep 6, 2017.

  1. Redbeard

    Redbeard JCW: because fast is fun!
    Supporting Member

    Dec 17, 2009
    1,636
    398
    83
    Glorified spreadsheet jockey.
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +413 / 0 / -0
  2. Qik

    Qik Well-Known Member

    Oct 27, 2015
    1,421
    670
    113
    IT
    Atlanta-ish
    Ratings:
    +811 / 0 / -0
    It's just ok. The front end is still fugly.
     
  3. Metalman

    Metalman Well-Known Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    Sep 29, 2009
    12,713
    7,659
    113
    Ex-Owner (Retired) of a custom metal fab company.
    Columbus, Ohio
    Ratings:
    +7,913 / 1 / -0
    It's ridiculous in this age of turbo's to be holding a 2 liter engine back at around 250 HP.... Hoping for more... This will probably be the last hurrah for the MINI GP as a IC engine...

    I'm not thrilled with the apparent new BMW aero design language that makes it look like a car is shedding it's skin...

    I think of this with all those aero flaps........

    [​IMG]
     
  4. Qik

    Qik Well-Known Member

    Oct 27, 2015
    1,421
    670
    113
    IT
    Atlanta-ish
    Ratings:
    +811 / 0 / -0
    To be fair, it is an improvement over the normal Fish face. Not saying a lot but still.
     
  5. Crashton

    Crashton Club Coordinator

    Jun 4, 2009
    19,424
    10,031
    113
    Retired old fart
    Hooterville Ohio USA
    Ratings:
    +11,656 / 2 / -0
    With that big cow catcher up front you'll be sure to pick up all the ladies. :ihih:

    [​IMG]
     
  6. Redbeard

    Redbeard JCW: because fast is fun!
    Supporting Member

    Dec 17, 2009
    1,636
    398
    83
    Glorified spreadsheet jockey.
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +413 / 0 / -0
    So, the M/A consensus is that it is ugly and underpowered. I disagree (mostly).

    The aero is definitely exaggerated for the concept. I doubt a finished product would have that sorta stuff on it. Active aero would be nice.

    I don't get the "fish face" argument. I, obviously, like the F56. The R56 has a very similar face to my eye. I like them both.

    [​IMG]

    The 250 hp thing seemed low to me as well. The Continental Tire cars are pushing 350 hp out of the same engine and turbo and beating the hell outta the drive train.

    Still, I won't shake a stick at it because my "heavy" 2,700lb JCW hauls the mail with 220'ish HP it's making. They never did mention the torque rating.
     
  7. Crashton

    Crashton Club Coordinator

    Jun 4, 2009
    19,424
    10,031
    113
    Retired old fart
    Hooterville Ohio USA
    Ratings:
    +11,656 / 2 / -0
    We all like different things. At first I really didn't like the looks of the F56, but as time has gone by I've grown accustomed to it. Your opinion is the only one that matters. You like it & you bought it. :Thumbsup:

    I buy my cars to please me, not anyone else. If they/them don't like what I drive so what. :prrr:
     
  8. Dave.0

    Dave.0 Helix & RMW Powered
    Lifetime Supporter

    May 4, 2009
    25,021
    13,497
    113
    Burbs of Philly, PA
    Ratings:
    +14,644 / 10 / -4
    New F'ed GP you say......



    [​IMG]
     
  9. HillbillyChili

    Jun 14, 2017
    91
    29
    18
    Software
    Columbus, OH
    Ratings:
    +35 / 0 / -0
    I still want to try the eMINI....
     
  10. Metalman

    Metalman Well-Known Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    Sep 29, 2009
    12,713
    7,659
    113
    Ex-Owner (Retired) of a custom metal fab company.
    Columbus, Ohio
    Ratings:
    +7,913 / 1 / -0
    #10 Metalman, Sep 6, 2017
    Last edited: Sep 6, 2017
    Let's wait and see how many flaps get replaced by stickers....

    And if they keep the center lock wheels...

    It's like the baby alien emerging.....

    It is different.... But it only a concept so for...

    Screen Shot 2017-09-06 at 5.42.15 PM.png

    If they keep the side flaps..... At least it should keep them from introducing a 4 door GP.....:wink:

    Screen Shot 2017-09-06 at 5.48.39 PM.png
     
  11. Crashton

    Crashton Club Coordinator

    Jun 4, 2009
    19,424
    10,031
    113
    Retired old fart
    Hooterville Ohio USA
    Ratings:
    +11,656 / 2 / -0
    I'm going to go out on limb here & say it looks better than the Civic Type R.
     
  12. Dave.0

    Dave.0 Helix & RMW Powered
    Lifetime Supporter

    May 4, 2009
    25,021
    13,497
    113
    Burbs of Philly, PA
    Ratings:
    +14,644 / 10 / -4
    Not by much..... :postcount
     
  13. vetsvette

    vetsvette MINI Alliance Ambassador

    Nov 9, 2013
    2,181
    1,782
    113
    South Central Virginia
    Ratings:
    +1,937 / 0 / -0
    That front end will never fly. It might hurt the ankles of some dumba$$ pedestrian.
     
  14. Nathan

    Nathan Founder

    Mar 30, 2009
    25,144
    10,052
    113
    Writer
    Short North
    Ratings:
    +10,069 / 0 / -0
    It's different.
     
  15. MCS02

    MCS02 Moderator
    Staff Member Articles Moderator Supporting Member

    Jul 31, 2009
    11,164
    6,170
    113
    Male
    Ratings:
    +7,876 / 10 / -3
    #15 MCS02, Sep 6, 2017
    Last edited: Sep 6, 2017
    It is different I do like some things about it but it won't get built.

    But this is the best looking mini face.:biggrin5:
     

    Attached Files:

  16. Redbeard

    Redbeard JCW: because fast is fun!
    Supporting Member

    Dec 17, 2009
    1,636
    398
    83
    Glorified spreadsheet jockey.
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +413 / 0 / -0
    So let me sum this up:

    1)Wahhhh? It's not an R53. Even though this is the F56 section.
    2)Fish face.
    3)Aero cladding sucks/looks like a Honda
    4)Seriously, it's not an R53.
    5)Here is a pic of an R53 to make everyone feel better.

    Did I miss anything?
     
  17. vetsvette

    vetsvette MINI Alliance Ambassador

    Nov 9, 2013
    2,181
    1,782
    113
    South Central Virginia
    Ratings:
    +1,937 / 0 / -0
    You are one of a small group of 3rd Gen fans RedBeard. Glad to have you aboard.
     
  18. Qik

    Qik Well-Known Member

    Oct 27, 2015
    1,421
    670
    113
    IT
    Atlanta-ish
    Ratings:
    +811 / 0 / -0
    #18 Qik, Sep 7, 2017
    Last edited: Sep 7, 2017
    It looks like a cat fish and it's not an argument. The only thing similar about the 2nd and 3rd gen is that they're MINI's. They look nothing alike. The 3rd gen has that puffy lower lip (Ya, I know it's functional. It's still ugly), bulged out grill/bumper usually with a chrome ring around it to highlight the ugly, and the headlights..... The headlights are the worst part. The only good thing (to me) about the gen3 MINI's is the interior.
    Saying 2 and 3 look the same is like saying 1 and 2 look the same. It's just not true. Ask a gen 1 owner.
     
  19. Metalman

    Metalman Well-Known Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    Sep 29, 2009
    12,713
    7,659
    113
    Ex-Owner (Retired) of a custom metal fab company.
    Columbus, Ohio
    Ratings:
    +7,913 / 1 / -0
    It is what it is....

    If you like it..... buy it...

    If you don't like it..... don't buy it...

    Beauty is in the eye of the beholder...

    With the intro of every GP, it's a signal of the end of a generation...

    Start saving for the 4th Gen in-home high capacity charger....

    And look for a charger at every turn of the Dragon.... 318 of them...:D
     
  20. Qik

    Qik Well-Known Member

    Oct 27, 2015
    1,421
    670
    113
    IT
    Atlanta-ish
    Ratings:
    +811 / 0 / -0
    I'm sure an electric MINI would be fine OTD. No long donut runs though, unless they're pushing out Tesla-esc range.
    Tesla OTD_zpsip9jo9qi.jpeg
     

Share This Page