MotoringFile MINI’s Official MPG Figures Are In for the US

Discussion in 'MINIs in Other Media' started by Nathan, Oct 8, 2010.

  1. Nathan

    Nathan Founder

    Mar 30, 2009
    25,144
    10,052
    113
    Writer
    Short North
    Ratings:
    +10,069 / 0 / -0
    #1 Nathan, Oct 8, 2010
    Last edited: Oct 8, 2010
    Naturally the most gaudy of the numbers belongs to the Cooper hatch at 37 mpg on the highway. But in our minds the MCS hatch is even more impressive at 36 mpg. That’s up 2 mpg while getting a 9 hp boost. Here’s the rundown:
    Cooper

    Hatch

    * 29 City
    * 32 Combined
    * 37 Hwy

    Clubman

    * 27 City
    * 31 Combined
    * 35 Highway

    Convertible

    * 27 City
    * 31 Combined
    * 35 Highway

    Countryman

    * 27 City
    * 31 Combined
    * 35 Hwy

    Cooper S

    Hatch

    * 27 City
    * 30 Combined
    * 36 Highway

    Clubman

    * 27 City
    * 30 Combined
    * 36 Highway

    Convertible

    * 27 City
    * 30 Combined
    * 36 Hwy

    Countryman

    * 26 City
    * 28 Combined
    * 32 Hwy

    Countryman All4

    * 25 City
    * 27 Combined
    * 31 Hwy
    JCW

    Hatch

    * 25 City
    * 28 Combined
    * 33 Hwy

    Clubman

    * 25 City
    * 28 Combined
    * 33 Hwy

    Convertible

    * 25 City
    * 28 Combined
    * 33 Hwy
     
  2. Justa Jim

    Justa Jim Well-Known Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    May 6, 2009
    7,422
    1,685
    113
    Ratings:
    +1,685 / 0 / -0
    36 is very impressive for the "S". I'm confused about the 37 for the justa being up one. My 2009 is listed at 37 highway.

    Jim
     
  3. Metalman

    Metalman Well-Known Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    Sep 29, 2009
    12,731
    7,688
    113
    Ex-Owner (Retired) of a custom metal fab company.
    Columbus, Ohio
    Ratings:
    +7,960 / 1 / -0
    So.....
    I wonder.....
    Are these real MPG figures?
    Or are they the bogus MPG figures?

    Is it real or is it Memorex?
    No Wait..... Ahhhh... What's a Memorex???:D
     
  4. Dr Obnxs

    Dr Obnxs New Member

    Jun 11, 2009
    1,158
    3
    0
    A Man of Wit and Charm! (Just ask my wife!)
    Woodside, CA, up in the hills and trees.
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    Well

    these numbers are based on the EPA defined driving cycle. FWIW, we regularly get higher than EPA highway in our Clubbie. I'm not surprised at the bump the S got as it now has variable valve timing on both cams and variable lift on the intakes. The Cooper already had those and only has sight tune benefits.

    We live in hills about 1500 feet above where we do our shopping and the kids go to school, and even with the hills and the stop-start we get the mid 30s combined. A long freeway drive will be about 40, and when I almost ran out of gas in the middle of Wyoming and was nursing it at about 50 MPH I got about 55 MPG....

    The Prince engine is really, really efficient.

    Matt
     
  5. jcauseyfd

    jcauseyfd New Member

    May 25, 2009
    201
    31
    0
    Graham, NC
    Ratings:
    +31 / 0 / -0
    Ditto on what Matt posted. I'm regularly able to get more than the EPA numbers on my 2008 MCS. I'm able to get better numbers than what's posted above for the 2011s even with the engine improvements.
     
  6. lotsie

    lotsie Club Coordinator

    May 5, 2009
    3,922
    401
    83
    stagehand/part time detailer
    Right here
    Ratings:
    +401 / 0 / -0
    I can get EPA #'s towing our teardrop, in our 08 Clubbie S, if I go easy on it.

    Mark
     
  7. Dr Obnxs

    Dr Obnxs New Member

    Jun 11, 2009
    1,158
    3
    0
    A Man of Wit and Charm! (Just ask my wife!)
    Woodside, CA, up in the hills and trees.
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    Remember...

    the EPA numbers are for a specific driving loop in terms of speed, acceleration and altidude changes. It's meant as a standard ruler to judge relative automotive efficiencies, but how and where you drive can and usually is, different.

    Also, the EPA mileage numbers were revised a few years ago, and they now more accuratly reflect the average use pattern! But still, even though the numbers are a better representation, your use will probably be different than the numbers quoted.

    Matt
     

Share This Page