Suspension Brakes 1st Gen TSW, now WMW V3 springs

Discussion in 'Tuning and Performance' started by mini_racer, Aug 1, 2010.

Tags:
  1. mini_racer

    mini_racer Well-Known Member

    May 4, 2009
    1,046
    57
    48
    Engr Manager
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +57 / 0 / -0
  2. cct1

    cct1 Well-Known Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    May 5, 2009
    3,378
    3,368
    113
    Ratings:
    +3,369 / 0 / -0
    Not sure the standard spring rates on the V3's, but you can get the springs for the V3's customized to whatever rates you want...

    Just make sure you dyno them to be sure though--I remember Marc bought springs, and they were way off--they sent the wrong springs. I have the V2's, can't remember the exact rates offhand, but the springs were fine.
     
  3. minimark

    minimark Well-Known Member

    Jun 24, 2009
    5,146
    1,302
    113
    Winston-Salem, NC
    Ratings:
    +1,302 / 0 / -0
    Think the V2 rate was 200 front and back and with the smaller diameter and straight shape of the front V3 spring, they went a touch heavier on the front, 210 front and 200 rear V3. Least that is what I understood after a conversation with Jeff awhile back when I was considering changing the fronts when doing the camber plates....
     
  4. mini_racer

    mini_racer Well-Known Member

    May 4, 2009
    1,046
    57
    48
    Engr Manager
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +57 / 0 / -0
    #4 mini_racer, Aug 1, 2010
    Last edited: Sep 21, 2010
    If I recall correctly, I was informed by TSW some time ago that their springs are 217 lbs/in in front and 200lbs/in in the back.

    However, I see other suspension options listed at 350, 400 or even 450 lbs/in. So, I am beginning to question whether or not I really have 200 lbs/in spings as they don't seem to be as weak as the numbers suggest.

    They even perform well for an occasional track day. So, could they be as light as I was originally informed? Has anyone dyno'd the TSW V3 springs?
     
  5. minimark

    minimark Well-Known Member

    Jun 24, 2009
    5,146
    1,302
    113
    Winston-Salem, NC
    Ratings:
    +1,302 / 0 / -0
    Think those high rate numbers are for coilover type springs which are smaller in diameter thus the heavier rates. But I'm not sure exactly how they compare. Maybe someone can fill us in.
     
  6. BThayer23

    BThayer23 Well-Known Member

    Jun 12, 2009
    1,315
    154
    63
    Civil Engineer
    Durham, NC
    Ratings:
    +155 / 0 / -0
    The spring rates for the TSW V3's mentioned above are correct. Yes, they're too soft for a track-only application, yet they're a bit firmer than stock. I believe the stock R53 sport springs were progressive and started at about 160lbs, but I'm not positive. The TSW's aren't a whole lot stiffer than stock, but they're a linear spring so the response is much more predictable.

    Track-specific applications use much stiffer springs. Coilovers use smaller diameter springs to save weight and shocks matched to the specific spring rate. Also, the smaller diameter coils are built in standard diameters, lengths, and spring rates, so they can be shared over a variety of applications.

    Source: evolutionm.net - View Single Post - Spring rate conversions kg/mm to lbs/in

    kg/mm to lbs/in
    -----------------------------
    16 = 896
    15 = 840
    14 = 784
    13 = 728
    12 = 672
    11 = 616
    10 = 560
    9.0 = 504
    8.5 = 476
    8.0 = 448
    7.5 = 420
    7.0 = 392
    6.5 = 364
    6.0 = 336
    5.5 = 308
    5.0 = 280
    4.5 = 252
    4.0 = 224
    3.0 = 168
    2.0 = 112
     
  7. andyroo

    andyroo New Member
    Motoring Alliance Sponsor

    Sep 8, 2009
    227
    6
    0
    water science and mapping, and suspesnion and brak
    Columbia, MD
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0
    It seems like you're confusing the KW V3 coilovers from TSW, V3 standing for Variant 3 which often have customizable rates that are pretty firm, and the TSW V3 springs, meaning version 3 as they have had 2 previous versions.

    They are not the same thing. The springs are much less expensive and are a nice little upgrade while the coilovers cost a bit more and are a pretty darn big upgrade.

    KW coilover springs have the rates printed on them by the way (in Newtons/mm i think).

    - Andrew
     
  8. cct1

    cct1 Well-Known Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    May 5, 2009
    3,378
    3,368
    113
    Ratings:
    +3,369 / 0 / -0
    Yeah, I was--I assumed the OP had the V3 coilovers, and was asking what the "standard" spring rates were. Looks like it's a "spring only" question in retrospect.
     
  9. andyroo

    andyroo New Member
    Motoring Alliance Sponsor

    Sep 8, 2009
    227
    6
    0
    water science and mapping, and suspesnion and brak
    Columbia, MD
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0
    That would kick ass if they could make the OEM fitment springs in whatever rate I want to fit Koni Yellows. 250 lbs/in front and rear with maybe a 5mm drop front and rear and that's it. That would rock with Koni Yellows. But i know they'd need a minimum order for that and no one else wants a spring that doesn't lower the car much. :(

    - andrew
     
  10. mini_racer

    mini_racer Well-Known Member

    May 4, 2009
    1,046
    57
    48
    Engr Manager
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +57 / 0 / -0
    Yes we are talking springs here not coil-overs. For an R53 the drop with these springs is ~ 3/4" in the front and ~ 7/8" in the back.

    Also in the OP was a link to the specific springs under question, so no confusion...... Springs.
     
  11. ScottinBend

    ScottinBend Space Cowboy
    Supporting Member

    May 4, 2009
    8,767
    2,547
    113
    Bend, OR USA
    Ratings:
    +2,678 / 1 / -0
    The OEM springs are linear.

    TSW V1, 2, 3 springs are also all linear.
     
  12. mini_racer

    mini_racer Well-Known Member

    May 4, 2009
    1,046
    57
    48
    Engr Manager
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +57 / 0 / -0
    Yes these are linear rate springs, and that was not in question. I was just looking to verify the actual rate.
     
  13. BThayer23

    BThayer23 Well-Known Member

    Jun 12, 2009
    1,315
    154
    63
    Civil Engineer
    Durham, NC
    Ratings:
    +155 / 0 / -0
    Hmm... I thought OEM was progressive in front, but I appear to be mistaken.
     
  14. cct1

    cct1 Well-Known Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    May 5, 2009
    3,378
    3,368
    113
    Ratings:
    +3,369 / 0 / -0
    Yeah, I thought both the OEM standard and JCW springs were progressive...
     
  15. minimark

    minimark Well-Known Member

    Jun 24, 2009
    5,146
    1,302
    113
    Winston-Salem, NC
    Ratings:
    +1,302 / 0 / -0
    OEM = linear
     

Share This Page