Fry: 2014 a "massive opportunity to fail" (racer.com)
Page 35 of 84
-
Steve AdministratorStaff Member Articles Moderator
-
Steve AdministratorStaff Member Articles Moderator
2014 car reveals are on the horizon.
We won't see the Lotus for a while, they're even going to skip the first test.
McLaren have announced they'll first show their car, on-line only, 24 Jan. Haven't noticed any other announcements. -
Steve AdministratorStaff Member Articles Moderator
Eddie Irvine's temper puts him back in the news again.
Irvine sentenced over brawl (racer.com)
-
Steve AdministratorStaff Member Articles Moderator
Sorry, it's unfair of me to blame this on his temper. If Irvine is telling the truth, the other guy -- angry about Irvine's contact with the guy's ex girlfriend -- started it when he hit him from behind.
-
Steve AdministratorStaff Member Articles Moderator
FIA reveal permanent F1 driver numbers (f1zone.net)
-
Steve AdministratorStaff Member Articles Moderator
While we wait to see how these new cars look...
When I see cars like this one I wonder what people thought of them at the time, esp. the team and drivers. I like to imagine the guy who came up with the idea trying to convince the rest of the team. And, unlike last season where the nose aesthetics were sort of forced by regulation restrictions, the nose below was designed with plenty of engineering elbow room. Imagine the drivers' faces when they saw the early drawings or mock-ups. Trot out this cool look today and see what your driver says.
BTW, that's Ronnie Peterson at the 'Ring in 1971. Change the nose and it's a good looking car. -
Exclusive Q&A: Gary Paffett discusses how McLaren's 2014 car is developing | Vodafone McLaren Mercedes News | Formula 1 Teams | Sky Sports
Sad thing is, it makes for ugly cars. Still better than killing a driver every month though. -
Minidave Well-Known MemberLifetime Supporter
Why do F1 cars have to be pretty?
As long as they're competitive, who cares what they look like? :confused5: -
ScottinBend Space CowboySupporting Member
I think the point is that the new cars are never going to look as good as the cars of the past. I to long for the beauty of the past, but am excited about what the future holds.
-
Crashton Club Coordinator
-
Steve AdministratorStaff Member Articles Moderator
Fast is beautiful in it's own way and that's why I watch, but there's no reason I can't hope they'll actually looked cool as well. I'm no fan of things like the artificial vanity panels concocted in a panic by the FIA (worried 'ugly' noses would drive away viewers) and used by some teams in 2013. I say make 'em functional and fast. My beef is with the strangling tight rule restrictions that keep the teams from being able to do what they like...which I suspect is a bit of both, fast trumping pretty, though, of course.
I wonder what the cars would look like if the non-safety aspects of the design rules were rolled back a few decades. Keep the rules that eliminate ground effects cars, set a relatively low restriction on maximum aero surface area, add a tight resource restriction to keep things from getting completely out of hand and then let them do what they want. Never mind, arm-chair quarterbacking in progress here. -
Minidave Well-Known MemberLifetime Supporter
I agree with the thought that in order to try and keep a lid on costs they've also managed to strangle innovation, but I don't think going backwards is the answer.
I also grew up with the shape of racecars back when so I have a natural bias towards what I thought was cool when I was first exposed to them. However, those cars would be ssssslllllllooooooooowwwwwww compared to today's missiles on wheels, especially without the current aero.
I think there's room in racedom for a formula much like the old Can Am, run whatcha brung.....but look what happened to that series when Porsche threw down the gauntlet of the 917...it almost became a Red Bull type" one make series very soon - well - one winner series anyway.
The old IMSA Prototype series worked pretty well too, it had V-12 Jags, V-8 Chevy "Corvettes", V-6 Nissans (and later Jags) and even 4 cyl turbo Toyotas all running in the same class and the racing was pretty exciting.
But aero is king now in pretty much any series, so we have these odd looking shapes now.....to young guys in their 20's just getting into F1, cars from back-when probably look odd. -
mrntd Well-Known MemberSupporting Member
- Sep 30, 2011
- 1,762
- Male
- Sales and Marketing manager
- Ratings:
- +1,763 / 0 / -0
Porsche killed both CanAm and IMSA. Lets hope they don't decide to get into F1.
-
Classic F1 cars without wings, and without much genuine attention to aerodynamics, are a different beast. -
Z06_Pilot Well-Known MemberLifetime Supporter
wow, that' too bad. I always liked seeing the shots of Jenson's dad, as he always had a smile on his face, and you could see the unbridled joy whenever Jenson would podium.
-
Crashton Club Coordinator
Sad news.
RIP John -
Steve AdministratorStaff Member Articles Moderator
Ecclestone steps down from F1 board (racer.com)
ANALYSIS: What Bernie Ecclestone's resignation means for F1 (racer.com)
-
Steve AdministratorStaff Member Articles Moderator
Will there be a NASCAR, F1 crossover?
NASCAR team boss Gene Haas plans new Formula 1 squad for 2015 (autosport.com)
-
Page 35 of 84