Rossi to replace Mehri at Manor for most of the remaining races this season. I'm guessing this should say something like "...unless Mehri ponies up more cash" but for now it looks like there will be an American on the back of the grid, and that includes COTA.
F1: Rossi to race in Singapore with Manor (racer.com)
Page 22 of 70
-
Steve AdministratorStaff Member Articles Moderator
-
Crashton Club Coordinator
Trouble is there is no American with enough F1 experience to fill the seat. I too would love to see an American at the wheel of Haas' car, but I understand his decision. The team is going to have a tough time learning the ropes. Having to train a driver would just add to that.
I think Rossi is good & given time may be a very good F1 driver. Watching his GP2 races he seems to fade at the end of the race where the really good guys are moving forward. Don't know why that is, maybe he is using the car up too early.-
Like x 1
- List
-
-
*°SPOILER ALERT*
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-
Like x 1
- List
-
-
Minidave Well-Known MemberLifetime Supporter
Well, since the cat's out of the bag......
This was a classic Vettel race the likes of which we haven't seen in a couple of years. It was simply amazing that he could carve out a 4 second gap in one lap, and he adapted his strategy as the race progressed. Just a dominant effort in a whole new way compared to the way the Benzer boys usually do it - which is simply to run away and hide all race.
Danny Ricky Bobby impressed too, which makes me wonder if the Renault engine is really as bad as they claim? Danny Kay was also right in the mix till he got caught out of sync with the safety car on his pit stop.
All in all a fun race to watch from 2nd on back, and Vettel did a remarkable job in controlling this race all the way to the win.
Of course, the big question is - how is it the fastest Mercedes which is usually 1.5 sec ahead of the closest competitor now 1.5 seconds slower?
Gotta love Hammie's brave face when he said he thought they still had the pace to win this race! Ha......yeah, right.......:biggrin5:-
Like x 1
- List
-
-
Steve AdministratorStaff Member Articles Moderator
I don't imagine they'll be running the GP at Suzuka under monsoon conditions again this year, or ever again for that matter. Nevertheless, they've made some revisions at the track based on lessons learned from last year.
Suzuka improves safety to avoid repeat of Bianchi crash (motorsport.com)
-
Like x 1
- List
-
-
Steve AdministratorStaff Member Articles Moderator
-
-
Like x 1
- List
-
-
Two teams call on EU to investigate F1 · F1 Fanatic
-
Like x 1
- List
-
-
Steve AdministratorStaff Member Articles Moderator
I've been wondering whether he would take RB sports car racing but they're not a manufacturer of road cars. It seems like buying and racing a Ferrari or Aston Martin (or whatever) in most classes would have little to no difference in effect than just paying to be an existing team's title sponsor but would be much more difficult and expensive. Unless they want to build their own cars, and that leaves the non-spec prototype classes, which brings back the engine question. The difference, though, is there are less engine design restrictions compared to F1 and more options available. So, a sports car prototype racing team (or teams?)? I'd love to see them work with Nissan to take that front wheel drive thing they're working on and fix it. Seems like Adrian Newey and Ben Bowlbey might be an unbeatable design team.....
But back to F1, they really do look stuck for 2016 unless they decide to take Ferrari up on a customer (read detuned) engine. They could do that as an interim solution though to carry them through 2016 while they work on their own engine or work with someone else on an engine for 2017.-
Like x 1
- List
-
-
ScottinBend Space CowboySupporting Member
Why wouldn't Red Bull simply take a year off and spend the time developing a car?
-
Like x 1
- List
-
-
Page 22 of 70