All about the market, what Austin had to offer and the breaks they would get..... and I'm sure they had an eye on NASCAR'S success in Texas too.![]()
Page 13 of 20
-
-
IndyCar does well in TX too.
Plus...It's very close to Mexico and with Sergio Perez as a driver you know that was a thought too. Add in that Carlos Slim is interested in F1. Being he has about $74 billion in his pocket you just know Bernie is scheming on how a few of those billions can fly into his pockets. -
Speaking of Bernie, I'm sure his delicate ego much prefers a track purpose built for F1 and not some other's lowly attempt at adapting to his/F1's needs....
PS: Very true about Indycar Nathan, may be just about the only other permanent circuit here in America that they enjoy a sizable attendance, other than Indy itself of course. -
Firebro17 Dazed, but not ConfusedLifetime Supporter
- Sep 18, 2010
- 3,327
- Retired CAL FIRE Battalion Chief
- Ratings:
- +3,328 / 0 / -0
You can't get any closer to Mexico than the Salinas Valley.
Lowley? -
Steve AdministratorStaff Member Articles Moderator
Austin receives planning permission for grandstand (gpupdate.net)
-
Minidave Well-Known MemberLifetime Supporter
Intersting...they finally got permits to build, and in the meantime those buildings are already being erected in New Jersey, where they only announced the track a few weeks ago.
-
goaljnky New Member
-
Steve AdministratorStaff Member Articles Moderator
Hermann Tilke says construction of Austin circuit is on schedule (autosport.com)
-
Steve AdministratorStaff Member Articles Moderator
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DImp-oJmsfQ]Circuit of the Americas Teaser Trailer - YouTube[/ame]
-
Steve AdministratorStaff Member Articles Moderator
Austin GP looks doubtful, says Ecclestone (Reuters via eurosport.yahoo.com)
-
Reassuring words from the great Bernie....
.....sure wish I had stock in the Austin GP......not. -
Autoweek has a really good article on how all this is going down in Austin.
See U.S. Grand Prix in Austin: Time to connect the dots -
Texas comptroller says money not guaranteed for U.S. Grand Prix
Source - Read more: Formula One: Texas comptroller says money not guaranteed for U.S. Grand Prix - Autoweek -
N2MINI MINI of the Month
Sounds more and more like it will be a no go in Austin..
I don't follow F1 too much and not at all on the money side of it but how do they justify
charging 25 million per race to the track!!! 16-18 races a year is a TON of money for someone!!! Then you have the TV contracts, sponsors etc... which monies I assume goes to the track to help pay the 25 million to start with??? -
As purely a F1 fan this is very disappointing. From a business owner and a tax payer in my state, I would understand and support Ms Combs's position, were it to be here in NC.
Bernie also has way to many flights of fancy for me to give him $25million up front.... Bernie and F1 are for sale to the highest bidder, previous commitments be damned.... -
Steve AdministratorStaff Member Articles Moderator
There are two main formulas in Formula One. One has to do with the cars and the racing and the other is Bernie Ecclestone's revenue formula.
I'm no expert but as far as I can make out all non-ticket revenue goes to FOM, the company Bernie runs F1 for. This does not include money raised by teams through team sponsorships, etc, but all TV revenue and anything under contract to F1 in general. Some of this is shared with the teams based on a percentage, don't know what the numbers are but of course the teams are always talking about how they get too little. In addition, if you want to host a race, you have to pay Ecclestone/FOM for the privilege. Speculation is Austin's $25M bill is actually lower than normal and the cost is typically closer to $35M per venue, per year.
Local race hosts/organizers make all their money from ticket sales, other sales, and anything else they can arrange like maybe an event title sponsor.
Bernie thinks his prices are cheap because after you pay him you'll be left with tons of money and will make a fortune. Of course he assumes race organizers will make most of this money through exorbitant ticket prices (from hundreds to thousands per person per race weekend) and he sees nothing wrong with that. In his view, you shouldn't even ask to host a race unless 1) local gov't is willing to pay even if it's a losing proposition because they want the influx of income F1 ought to bring to the local economy, or 2) you're sure you can fill the stands with many thousands of fans willing and able to pay high prices, or 3) both.
To him, the $35M price tag is just his cut of the fortune you'll make..... -
All well and good Steve if you can trust him to abide by the deal. There are an awefull lot of variables in one of these deals, variables that Bernie can use to snatch an event away from you when a better offer comes in...
Look what he's doing in Austin, already setting up his escape as everyone clamors for their piece of the F1 pie in in the US...
....pie....big pie....they couldn't even come close to matching the NASCAR attendance at Indy. Me thinks Bernie knows he has to pocket all the money he can up front... -
Steve AdministratorStaff Member Articles Moderator
I didn't say it was a good formula...sarcastic attitude isn't easily expressed via text.
You're right, Bernie honors his contracts if he wants to honor his contracts. Ya pays yer money (up front) and ya takes yer chances. -
Redbeard JCW: because fast is fun!Supporting Member
Gah. I really appreciate Mrs. Combs position. She sees the benefit and wants to support it but isn't going to waste tax-payer's dollars. Good on her.
Being an F1 fan I would have loved to see a race in Texas. It's looking like there will be a seriously PO'ed track developer in the near future.
I'm honestly not interested in the F1 race in New Jersey. I'll watch it on TV but I have zero motivation to go there and see the race. I've been to there. The area around the course is a hole, and staying in New York is BLOODY expensive. No thanks.
Page 13 of 20