Ford Focus RS could get 350-hp EcoBoost, E-diff

Discussion in 'Other Vehicles' started by e46tor56, Nov 8, 2012.

  1. Jason Montague

    Jason Montague New Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    Jan 5, 2010
    6,134
    1,588
    0
    Physician Assitant (retired)
    Sherman,Tx
    Ratings:
    +1,588 / 0 / -0
    #21 Jason Montague, Nov 15, 2012
    Last edited: Nov 15, 2012
     
  2. cooperSml

    cooperSml New Member

    Jul 20, 2011
    162
    54
    0
    Engineer
    Living on South
    Ratings:
    +55 / 0 / -0
  3. cooperSml

    cooperSml New Member

    Jul 20, 2011
    162
    54
    0
    Engineer
    Living on South
    Ratings:
    +55 / 0 / -0
    :drool
     
  4. cct1

    cct1 Well-Known Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    May 5, 2009
    3,378
    3,368
    113
    Ratings:
    +3,369 / 0 / -0
    Saw a cobra with Shelby's signature on the glove compartment, where I have my car tuned...Sheer lust.

    The RS would be on my short list if I ever got out of the MINI--provided it ever makes it state side. It kills me--Europe's gas prices are sky high, and they're known more for economy than we are here in the U.S., yet the RS doesn't see the light of day here.

    I asked a few poobahs at Ford about this--and the bottom line is Ford feels the perception of the Focus in the U.S. is that of an econobox, and no one will be willing to pay slightly south of 40K for a "Focus". Despite the fact that at under 40K, that car would be a performance bargain. And the Focus in the RS version is drop dead gorgeous.

    Still waiting to see if the RS version of the Fiesta will ever see the light of day--that would be even higher on my list than a Focus.
     
  5. jiminni

    jiminni Well-Known Member

    May 7, 2009
    1,592
    262
    83
    Ca.
    Ratings:
    +262 / 0 / -0
    You can still get the ST here in the States.......252 hp is not to shabby, under $29k, still a bargin compared to a Mini.
     
  6. Jason Montague

    Jason Montague New Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    Jan 5, 2010
    6,134
    1,588
    0
    Physician Assitant (retired)
    Sherman,Tx
    Ratings:
    +1,588 / 0 / -0
    :cornut: I understand what you are saying but,to me, that's not a bargin, the MINI is.:Thumbsup:

    Jason
     
  7. Redbeard

    Redbeard JCW: because fast is fun!
    Supporting Member

    Dec 17, 2009
    1,636
    398
    83
    Glorified spreadsheet jockey.
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +413 / 0 / -0
    Especially when you can have a 415/hp Mustang for that kinda $.

    Most of the STs I've priced have been 26-27k. The 29-30k range adds in a bunch of the fancy stuff.
     
  8. jiminni

    jiminni Well-Known Member

    May 7, 2009
    1,592
    262
    83
    Ca.
    Ratings:
    +262 / 0 / -0
    Yea, the one I looked at had the Ford Sync touch screen, when....when it works is very nice, when its acting up, not so much. My Lincoln has the same system.

    Mustang, Focus.....different ideas, both good. For that price point I like the ST better. Money not a factor......Shelby gt500!
     
  9. cct1

    cct1 Well-Known Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    May 5, 2009
    3,378
    3,368
    113
    Ratings:
    +3,369 / 0 / -0
    There is only one Mustang I'd consider--Boss Laguna Seca, especially now that it's coming out with an independent rear suspension. That is arguably the biggest bang for the buck performance car out there. Needs better brakes, but other than that, it's a purpose built track beast that happens to be street legal. Nothing else comes close, not even the new GP.
     
  10. Redbeard

    Redbeard JCW: because fast is fun!
    Supporting Member

    Dec 17, 2009
    1,636
    398
    83
    Glorified spreadsheet jockey.
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +413 / 0 / -0
    ...Boss 302? No. Production ends 2013. They will all have live rears that perform as well if not better than IRS. You've driven one and had braking issues? I'm interested in the detail of that. The GTs I've driven had phenomenal brakes. Those weren't the 6-pot Brembos either.

    Next iteration of Mustang might have IRS. They also might have a turbo V6 as thier "GT" model. Then it won't be a Mustang any more. Regardless of badging.
     
  11. jiminni

    jiminni Well-Known Member

    May 7, 2009
    1,592
    262
    83
    Ca.
    Ratings:
    +262 / 0 / -0
    #31 jiminni, Nov 17, 2012
    Last edited: Nov 17, 2012
    :eek6: That reminds me of the "Mustang ll" :frown2:
     
  12. cct1

    cct1 Well-Known Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    May 5, 2009
    3,378
    3,368
    113
    Ratings:
    +3,369 / 0 / -0
    302 Boss Laguna Seca, not the base 302. Although the 302 is more practical.

    The Laguna Seca is a complete track package, it's basically a race car. There have been issues with brake fade, according to those who own them and track them hard (ie those that don't use cruise control), one I know for sure is replacing the brakes, the other who is considering it--it's not an issue of braking, but braking over time. I have not driven a Laguna Seca, only a Boss, and not on the track. I do trust those that do track them, especially the guy who tracks his at Road America, he's forgotten more than I'll ever know.
     
  13. jiminni

    jiminni Well-Known Member

    May 7, 2009
    1,592
    262
    83
    Ca.
    Ratings:
    +262 / 0 / -0
    #33 jiminni, Nov 17, 2012
    Last edited: Nov 17, 2012
    So got to test drive, very small test drive, the ST today at the Fresno Auto Show, 2013-Model Central California Auto Show - General Info

    Got to hit it pretty hard a few times :ihih: The ST has 252 hp and 270lbs torque. My car has close to its hp but way less torque. The ST has a real smooth clutch and shifter, my car, smooth shifter, stage 4 clutch which is kinda touchy in first. That being said, yes the ST seemed quick, but, hmm.....my car seems quicker? My car does have the 05 tranny swap with a LSD, so it jumps in low gears. So it might just be a "feeling", or might be just because I couldn't completely flog the ST, there was a tester with me? Would love to get it on the highway. Very nice sound from it when opened up though :Thumbsup: They told me they should be more available from the dealers in a couple months.
    Also finally got to see and sit in a Scion FRS. Nice, but still a Scion. They said they are upping production on them now, many more available in 2013, hope so, really want to drive one. Plus he did confirm that a turbo model will be out for 2014, so look for them around September :idea:
     
  14. Dave.0

    Dave.0 Helix & RMW Powered
    Lifetime Supporter

    May 4, 2009
    25,021
    13,497
    113
    Burbs of Philly, PA
    Ratings:
    +14,644 / 10 / -4
    ^^^^ nice review.
     
  15. cct1

    cct1 Well-Known Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    May 5, 2009
    3,378
    3,368
    113
    Ratings:
    +3,369 / 0 / -0
    I've been following the BRZ/FRS closely since I first heard of them. If I wasn't keeping my MINI forever, these would be high on the list.

    Try driving the BRZ if you get a chance--much nicer quality interior than the FRS. I've driven both--both are great, but I'd take the BRZ, even though it's almost identical to the FRS, the interior just somehow gives the BRZ the feeling it has more quality.

    These cars have a manual transmission to die for--you have to keep reminding yourself these cars come in under 30k. Only been able to drive them in a gentlemanly fashion though; I'd love to take one on the track. They need to rev high to really get it out of them, and I wasn't allowed to do that.

    If Subaru makes a BRZ in an STI version, watch out--that car would be incredible. We'll have to see what TRD will do with the Scion, that could be interesting too. From what I've read, the HP will increase somewhere to the 250-280HP range--apparently subaru wants to keep the BRZ STI a notch below the WRX for sales purposes, if that's true, it's not going to be anywhere near the WRX STI. Still could be pretty damned good at 280 HP though.

    The aftermarket crowd is already all over these, but there seems to be fair amount of differing opinion on how much the stock internals can handle before they need to be upgraded.
     
  16. Jason Montague

    Jason Montague New Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    Jan 5, 2010
    6,134
    1,588
    0
    Physician Assitant (retired)
    Sherman,Tx
    Ratings:
    +1,588 / 0 / -0
    :cornut: In most cases, that would be a case of merely changing pads to EBC REDSTUFF(street/track) or YELLOWSTUFF(track only) or, any other brand of comparable pads.:Thumbsup:

    Jason

    Boss Laguna Seca! Boss Laguna Seca! Boss Laguna Seca!
     
  17. jiminni

    jiminni Well-Known Member

    May 7, 2009
    1,592
    262
    83
    Ca.
    Ratings:
    +262 / 0 / -0
    I asked about a STI version of the FRS, he said had not heard anything. But when the non STI turbo does come out next year, what kinda hp do you think it will have? I'm thinking at least 250? They had the Dodge Dart there also, not impressed......Fiats, actually kinda cool, Abarth edition. They use a turbo 1.4lt that I thought was a Chrysler, Chrysler logos all over the engine compartment, but was told it was a Fiat design?
     
  18. cct1

    cct1 Well-Known Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    May 5, 2009
    3,378
    3,368
    113
    Ratings:
    +3,369 / 0 / -0
    Agree on the Dart, it looks better in pictures than in person. Really wanted to like that car, it got such great reviews, but I don't. Still haven't driven one though, probably never will.

    Everything points to a BRZ STI coming in at 250-280 BHP--most likely the former. I would be stunned to see it any higher than 280. However if it came in at 280 BHP, and a simple tune could get you near 280 WHP, you'd really have something there, it's a light car. I have to stop this, before I talk myself into one......
     
  19. e46tor56

    e46tor56 New Member

    Nov 3, 2012
    357
    63
    0
    BMW/MINI Parts Advisor
    Southern NH
    Ratings:
    +63 / 0 / -0
    I read somewhere that Toyota is going to go with a Supercharger on their TRD version of the FRS.
     
  20. cct1

    cct1 Well-Known Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    May 5, 2009
    3,378
    3,368
    113
    Ratings:
    +3,369 / 0 / -0
    I've read SC, TC, and NA with regard to Toyota. SC is the consensus, but it's all really a guess at this point.

    There is the twin charge concept, but that will never see the light of day as a production vehicle.
     

Share This Page