You're right. I hadnt paid attention to the category, so I will avoid the "politics and messy stuff" category, and I didn't know I had the option to block topics. I will check that out. So, all you little men can by all means burn off some testosterone through reciting all the fair and balanced, no spin tag lines you wish to spew. Go for it. I'll look just a few more times for the amusing slings and arrows you throw my way ... then block it when the jism dries. And, yes, extremely low road, not to mention dead wrong.
That makes a lot of sense and I appreciate the line-drawing and work/time you put in. So let me understand, you lashed me because I made it personal, and that is different from racist remarks? After all, those Kenyan slurs were not only personal to our President and factually wrong, but he cannot defend himself because they haven't yet made a Bulletproof Mini Limo? I just want to understand your line-drawing approach, Nathan. For the record, I am a life-long fiscal conservative, but grew up having been taught to respect the President and the office of the presidency, no matter the party affiliation. By the way, by Wednesday or so, I would like to know how to unsubscribe. I promised photos of my dealer-installed driving lamps and sports gauges some readers asked for. I do like to follow through on my promises, so please don't administratively unsubscribe me before I have the chance to post those photos (not yet sure how to do that either). I will unsubscribe myself by Wednesday. I do not want to be a pain so I will voluntarily go away. I just want to do those photos first. I try to be a man of my word.
The Constitution, like the Bible, is open to interpretation. Example of differing interpretations? Sure. Try this one on for size. "Eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth." The common interpretation is that if you take my eye out, I (or our society) take(s) out yours. Alternatively, if I take your eye out, I become responsible for becoming your eyes. Maybe it is just me, but I want my grandchildren to grow up in a world that reflects the latter rather than the former. So ... the reason we have a judicial branch is for this reason precisely ... to interpret the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and other laws/statutes of national consequence. To be fully forthcoming and all due "respect," I'll go with the Supreme Court and take a pass on your interpretation. I sure wish this political season focused more on what each candidate will do do, and how, and less on what they say the others said, did not say, did, did not do. As it has instead devolved, I have no clue what their presidencies will look like or what we might expect. And it's broad brush know it alls that make the haze thicker and invite more lack of clarity. I for one (All4One), do not know how right or wrong I am in my opinions. What matters are the results, and the integrity and fairness of how we, together, get there.
Show me *IN* the Constitution where this is supported, then persuade me that the amendments are unconstitutional, and then show proof that the majority opinions of the Supreme Court justices never interpret the Constitution. Thereby, your source, of course not cited at all, is but a viable emotional appeal. Sure, post the thing. The writer is thoughtful and I can respect that.
Let us move beyond this and get back to the topic at hand. Again, that being the woes of Fisker Motors while spending the money provided by the US Taxpayers.
