Pffff why would I do that? That's stupid.
Page 10 of 24
-
Dave.0 Helix & RMW PoweredLifetime Supporter
-
Dave.0 Helix & RMW PoweredLifetime Supporter
For the first time this year, a major polling operation (UPI) says that Donald Trump has overtaken Hillary Clinton in the only race that matters – the Electoral College race.
Now:
Trump 292
Hillary - 246
Could end up
Trump 333
Clinton 205
UPI Poll -
[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSeMSOEz8EM"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSeMSOEz8EM[/ame] -
-
WASHINGTON, Oct. 19 (UPI) -- The UPI/CVoter daily presidential tracking poll released Wednesday shows Hillary Clinton leading Donald Trump by 4.88 points as the presidential candidates head into their final debate.
The online poll shows Clinton with 50.53 percent, to Trump's 45.63 percent and 3.82 percent choosing "other." In the poll, "others" are defined as respondents who decline to pick Clinton or Trump. -
I'll trust a republican strategist from today over the UPI from Sept 27, but that's just me...
Incidentally, I think 400 is a bit over the top, and it kind of makes me think Republicans are setting the bar high, so that if she comes in at 310, they can claim a Pyrrhic victory.
But here is the latest UPI poll from three days ago:
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2016/10/17/UPICVoter-state-polls-Hillary-Clinton-maintains-Electoral-College-edge-over-Donald-Trump/2791476718890/ -
Dave.0 Helix & RMW PoweredLifetime Supporter
-
Today's quote:
“I would like to promise and pledge to all of my voters and supporters and to all of the people of the United States that I will totally accept the results of this great and historic presidential election – if I win.†-
Dave.0 Helix & RMW PoweredLifetime Supporter
Pentagon Officials Furious After Clinton Announces US Response Time for Nuclear Launch During Debate.
(4 minutes) Vladimir Putin says thanks puppet Hillary.
Following Wednesday’s presidential debate Pentagon officials found themselves completely dumbfounded as to why former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would feel it appropriate to announce U.S. Special Access Program intel on national television.
According to sources within the Department of Defense speaking under anonymity, Clinton likely violated at least two Dept. of Defense SAP protocols during the debate by announcing on live television the United States Government’s response time for a nuclear launch. -
http://www.snopes.com/clinton-four-minute-nuclear/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
I wouldn't mind seeing a split congress. It might force Republicans and Democrats to compromise -- one can only hope.
It would also somewhat limit the power of whoever wins the White House.
CD -
Dave.0 Helix & RMW PoweredLifetime Supporter
Yeah I saw that and it's ********. -
Dave.0 Helix & RMW PoweredLifetime Supporter
Hillary corrupt campaign top 10
With knowledge of what is currently transpiring, here are the ten most damning Clinton emails regarding the media’s collusion with her presidential campaign, with hotlinks to the original WikiLeaks release.
1. Clinton Staff hosts private “off-the-record cocktail party†with 38 “influential†reporters, journalists, editors, and anchors (from 16 different mainstream media outlets including CNN, NBC, CBS, NYT, MSNBC, & more) with the stated goal of “framing the race.â€
2. Donna Brazile (CNN contributor at the time, and current DNC Chairman now) leaked CNN town hall questions to Hillary Clinton’s staff prior to the debate.
3. Clinton campaign and the New York Times coordinating attack strategy against Trump.
4. Glen Thrush, POLITICO’s chief political correspondent and senior staff writer for POLITICO Magazine, sends John Podesta an article for his approval. Writes: “Please don’t share or tell anyone I did this. Tell me if I ****ed up anything.â€
5. Huffington Post contributor Frank Islam writes to John Podesta in an email titled “My blogs in the Huffington Postâ€, says “I am committed to make sure she is elected the next president.†“Please let me know if I can be of any service to you.â€
6. Clinton staffer “Placing a story†with Politico / New York Times: “place a story with a friendly journalist†“we have a very good relationship with Maggie Haberman of Politico†“we should shape likely leaks in the best light for HRC.â€
7. John Podesta receiving drafts of New York Times articles before they’re published.
8. Clinton staff colluding with New York Times and Wall Street Journal to paint Hillary’s economic policies in a “progressive†light.
9. CNBC panelist colluding with John Podesta on what to ask Trump when he calls in for an interview.
10. Clinton staff appearing to control the release times of Associated Press articles.
The reality revealed in these emails is one of media collusion with powerful interests, which only serve to keep the American people in the dark about what is actually transpiring. The exact opposite of transparency. -
I'm all for having better choices, but until someone breaks up the monopoly then this is what we are stuck with. Seriously, Prior to Judge Green breaking up MaBell, that was the only option. Had that no happened would communications be where it is today. The single controlling entity had no competition to worry bout. Just keep giving people the same options.
Its no different with politics. Same ol same ol. Or one that says they are going to bust up the monopoly. -
N2MINI MINI of the Month
That's just it. No Dem or Rep. is going to vote the system out so the only hope is like cct1 said awhile back in that it will send a message if a 3rd Party person gets alot of votes. Course it only matters if the next election they get more and more till they become relevant to main stream America. Will take years for it to work if at all but you have to start somewhere...
-
mrntd Well-Known MemberSupporting Member
- Sep 30, 2011
- 1,762
- Male
- Sales and Marketing manager
- Ratings:
- +1,763 / 0 / -0
While a 3rd party can work on the lower elections it can't for president because of the way the presidential election system works. Until the system is changed to actual vote counts there will be only 2 parties for presidential elections.
The best chance a 3rd party has is to gain in lower elections and power then take over one of the 2 parties. That was been the goal of the Tea Party.
Page 10 of 24