Most liked posts in thread: MINI Set the Bar in Consumer Reports Reliability Ratings

  1. minimark

    minimark Well-Known Member

    Jun 24, 2009
    5,146
    1,302
    113
    Winston-Salem, NC
    Ratings:
    +1,302 / 0 / -0
    But it will give them much more time to text with less distractions.....:screwy:
     
  2. Crashton

    Crashton Club Coordinator

    Jun 4, 2009
    19,445
    10,057
    113
    Retired old fart
    Hooterville Ohio USA
    Ratings:
    +11,698 / 2 / -0
    Not sure airbags have made folks more dangerous drivers. I do know the vast majority of people don't know how abs works & will lift their foot off the brake when it starts pulsing. :crazy:

    My Ford stync is one reason Ford did not come out well in the consumerist reports testing. Folks expect the things in their cars to work I guess. I think MINIs odd ergonomics also play a role in their low scores. What is neat & quirky to many is oh so odd to the main steam. MINI is even changing this as to not shock the main steam buyer. Moved the window switches to the doors in the countryguy & look at the dash in the F'n56. Brings this question to mind. Did these car buyers not look at these cars & test drive them? :confused5:

    Rating cars the same way you rate toasters is a stupid idea, but that's consumerist reports way.
     
  3. cct1

    cct1 Well-Known Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    May 5, 2009
    3,378
    3,368
    113
    Ratings:
    +3,369 / 0 / -0
    I wouldn't use them soley to buy a car--they don't really give a rat's behind about performance--but their reliability data for everyday drivers is nothing to dismiss.
     
  4. Dave.0

    Dave.0 Helix & RMW Powered
    Lifetime Supporter

    May 4, 2009
    25,021
    13,497
    113
    Burbs of Philly, PA
    Ratings:
    +14,644 / 10 / -4
    That's good but most car owner today don't even know how to check the oil in a car.
     
  5. Friskie

    Friskie Well-Known Member

    Jul 20, 2009
    1,650
    1,333
    113
    Highly motivated retiree
    In the here and now, for now.
    Ratings:
    +1,339 / 0 / -0
    That's called anecdotal evidence which has no standing for making judgment calls based on the findings of a large population sampling.

    "All Indians walk in single file. I know because the one that I saw, did."
     
  6. Friskie

    Friskie Well-Known Member

    Jul 20, 2009
    1,650
    1,333
    113
    Highly motivated retiree
    In the here and now, for now.
    Ratings:
    +1,339 / 0 / -0
    You've never dealt with a fallacy of logic?
     
  7. Friskie

    Friskie Well-Known Member

    Jul 20, 2009
    1,650
    1,333
    113
    Highly motivated retiree
    In the here and now, for now.
    Ratings:
    +1,339 / 0 / -0
    :lol:
     
  8. cct1

    cct1 Well-Known Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    May 5, 2009
    3,378
    3,368
    113
    Ratings:
    +3,369 / 0 / -0
    It may not be the most accurate measure, but just because it's not perfect doesn't mean there isn't some merit to it....Their reliability ratings are about as unbiased as you can get. They do put too much weight on relatively minor complaints, but there is some degree of merit to their data. Does anyone on here seriously believe MINI is going to be as reliable as Lexus?

    This is rock bottom we're talking about here, not one of those areas where 5 cars are seperated by 1 meaningless percentage point....

    Hopefully they'll improve. But then again, BMW's don't rate that high either.
     
  9. pmsummer

    pmsummer Well-Known Member

    Apr 3, 2012
    570
    400
    63
    Semi-retired planner
    Jack Coffee Hays County, The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +400 / 0 / -0
    No, obviously. But CR's methodology remains seriously flawed due to the nature of the pool of owners they draw from (it works both ways, too... for years Cadillac scored unusually high numbers when they polled Cadillac owners, because they 'forgave' problems they would complain about in a less 'prestigious' car). And as I said, attributing an unfamiliar operating system with vehicle failure is flat-out wrong. J.D. Power does a much better job in this area with their "Owner Satisfaction" survey (clearer definition/tabulation of faults, broader survey pool).

    In the CR survey, vehicles with extremely good reliability scores are downgraded for issues unrelated to faults. It's rather like a Porsche 911 being called 'unreliable' because the backseat was discovered to too small for anyone other than short double-amputees.
     
  10. pmsummer

    pmsummer Well-Known Member

    Apr 3, 2012
    570
    400
    63
    Semi-retired planner
    Jack Coffee Hays County, The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +400 / 0 / -0
    ...and yes, my MINI has seen the dealership more than any car I've owned (with the possible exception of my VW Scirocco). I'd be far less 'forgiving' if all the problems hadn't been handled under warranty and extended-warranty.
     
  11. pmsummer

    pmsummer Well-Known Member

    Apr 3, 2012
    570
    400
    63
    Semi-retired planner
    Jack Coffee Hays County, The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +400 / 0 / -0
    Anyone have a link to the CR scores?
     
  12. cct1

    cct1 Well-Known Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    May 5, 2009
    3,378
    3,368
    113
    Ratings:
    +3,369 / 0 / -0
    How did MINI do on J.D. Powers?:wink:
     
  13. pmsummer

    pmsummer Well-Known Member

    Apr 3, 2012
    570
    400
    63
    Semi-retired planner
    Jack Coffee Hays County, The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +400 / 0 / -0
    It depends on the metric. Below average (power-train quality) to superior (body & interior quality and power-train performance).

    J.D. Power lists it as a "Top Pick" under sporty compacts. Overall reliability is listed as average.
     
  14. Nathan

    Nathan Founder

    Mar 30, 2009
    25,144
    10,052
    113
    Writer
    Short North
    Ratings:
    +10,069 / 0 / -0
  15. pmsummer

    pmsummer Well-Known Member

    Apr 3, 2012
    570
    400
    63
    Semi-retired planner
    Jack Coffee Hays County, The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +400 / 0 / -0
    On the JD Power chart, IF you throw out Lexus and Land Rover as outliers (which for statistical purposes is valid), you have a best to worth range of 94 problems per 100 cars for Porsche (.94 problems per car) to 190 problems per 100 vehicles for Dodge (1.9 problems per car).

    MINI comes in below the industry average of 1.26 problems per car (Mazda, Chevrolet, Ford, Cadillac grouping) at 1.5 problems per vehicle (that's in the Audi, Volvo, Chrysler group).

    So... the best vehicle has essentially one problem per vehicle. The worst has two problems per car. MINI has 1.5 problems. These numbers are a FAR CRY from what they were just ten years ago, and essentially indicate there are very few problems with new cars sold in the USA across the board... including MINI.
     
  16. pmsummer

    pmsummer Well-Known Member

    Apr 3, 2012
    570
    400
    63
    Semi-retired planner
    Jack Coffee Hays County, The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +400 / 0 / -0
    Not per car. The number of incidences per car remain the same. Using your argument, Lexus (at 74 per 100) would be FAR worse than MINI... because they sell so many more cars. OMG!

    Yes, MINIs are more difficult than Toyotas... but just slightly. They are also more fun to drive by a long shot. Parts are more expensive than Toyota, but not much more than OEM VW parts (if at all).

    After years of owning VWs amd BMWs, I was spoiled by the Ford I bought (Contour SVT). Fast, fun, reliable, and the parts were half what VW parts were. When I bought my MINI, I knew it would be sort of a cross between my VW/BMW experiences and my Ford experience.

    I was right, and I've been pleased with my purchase. It's been more reliable than the other German engineered cars I've owned, FAR more reliable than the British cars of my distant past, and not quite as reliable as my Contour.