I have owned a 3 cylinder car too. Yep 3 cylinders & no valves. A two stroke SAAB & while fun it was a rough noisy old girl. Wonder if the MINI will have a column shift like the SAAB?
I know the only thing in common with the little prince is the cylinder count.
ostcount
Page 2 of 3
-
Crashton Club Coordinator
-
GreyLens New MemberLifetime Supporter
I love the sound of the triple. If they do it right in a car engine it will be recognizable from a long way away. The Rocket III is a monster and the triple carries all of its character. Hope they don't blow this...I'll buy one for sure if its done right. -
Dave.0 Helix & RMW PoweredLifetime Supporter
Maybe then the end of the Gen 3's we will see a special 3 cylinder GP III.
By then a GP should only cost $75,000 before dealer markup.
:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: -
Metalman Well-Known MemberLifetime Supporter
- Sep 29, 2009
- 7,688
- Ex-Owner (Retired) of a custom metal fab company.
- Ratings:
- +7,960 / 1 / -0
I would drive that....
Red line at 7K..... -
Steve AdministratorStaff Member Articles Moderator
It's an interesting manufacturing concept supposedly meant to lower costs, etc. Someone please tell me if I'm reading and/or interpreting this incorrectly.
If you make all engines with 500cc cylinders you can have a 1.5L 3cyl, a 2.0L 4cyl, a 2.5L 5cyl, a 3.0L 6cyl. And if the anti-8 cylinder trend continues that's probably it, so potentially four basic block configurations for a full range of cars, and in BMW's case for two ranges (including MINI). -
What about a 3.5L 7CYL?
-
AnsonIvan Local Shop Owner
Is there a timing belt on the flywheel end of the crank shaft? Can't wait to service those
-
Metalman Well-Known MemberLifetime Supporter
- Sep 29, 2009
- 7,688
- Ex-Owner (Retired) of a custom metal fab company.
- Ratings:
- +7,960 / 1 / -0
Sure looks tiny.....
-
GreyLens New MemberLifetime Supporter
-
GreyLens New MemberLifetime Supporter
-
720 / 7 = 102.85714285714285714285714285714* per combustion cycle
I don't like that math. However, a 4.5L 9 cyl would equal exactly 80*! :cornut: -
-
Crashton Club Coordinator
BMW has made many wonderful silky smooth inline sixes over the years. Can't see a reason for them to build a V6. The trend is 4 cylinder & now 3 cylinder engines for BMWs. They are reducing cylinders not growing them.
-
-
Steve AdministratorStaff Member Articles Moderator
If these numbers are correct...
So, minimum of 120 bhp and 132 ft/lb for an NA 3cyl and max of 264 bhp and 264 ft/lb for a turbo 4cyl.
Their per cylinder numbers probably don't really show the true upper limits they'll be able to achieve with tuning, different (or more?) turbos, etc. If so, assume further bumps up for top of the line models...like maybe bump those 4cyl numbers for JCW?
What will 5 or 6 cylinders make? Or 8? Do the simple math. -
Crashton Club Coordinator
-
For some reason I thought they meant the S will still get the current 1.6L 4 cyl -- a 2.0L 4 cyl would be a big step up...fuel economy would probably suffer some.
Page 2 of 3