GUDOOOSHHHH.
Page 3 of 5
-
-
so these gun laws will actually hurt the finance of the gun shop owners and will make cali more vulnerable to out-of-state gun attacks? lol.
-
goaljnky New Member
-
BlimeyCabrio Oscar Goldman of MINIsLifetime Supporter
- May 4, 2009
- 2,896
- Professional Facilitator and Alignment Consultant
- Ratings:
- +2,896 / 0 / -0
Look to DC or New York or Chicago if you want to see what happens when only the criminals have guns...
-
got any 12ga slugs? If so, send them my way....Wally-World has been out of stock since the '08 election.
-
-
good price. I bet shipping would kill that though.
Wally-World has 20pk Remington slugs for $13.99. Trick is knowing when they're in stock. They go quick. Can't shoot anything else at the range.
I bought a GSG-5PK for just this reason....$14 for 1000 rds :lol: -
Most of the gun laws are misguided efforts
to thwart crime. We really have cultural issues why we as a society keep blowing so many people away. There are countries with higher per capita gun ownership with much lower per capita firearm related death rates.
But then, most of the arguements about gun restriction are pretty twisted too. just another area where things in our country are all effed up.
And before Blimey starts saying I'm an NPR liberal, I'm also a gun owner (own ammo too!)
Matt -
Rixter Well-Known Member
I don't even own a gun BTW -
Ammo in our neck of the woods
is really tough to find. Get out and away from the metro areas and it can be a bit easier to find.
Here's an article of interest perhaps. -
no, it's not of interest. It's on Faux News
-
BLUCOOPR New Member
All the shops, are out of ammunition here in NC, heard the bill was coming and we bought it all up and then some! We are ready to shut the government down if they keep getting and doing stupid things against its citizens!
-
-
In the world of "conspircy" thoughts I would imagine the information and control by these amunition and gun regulations (laws) gives goverments ability of acurately knowing who has weapons and amunition in the "mass" public to allow madatory (forced)confiscation in the event of of a posible resistance to such things as laws such as requiring the swine flu shot?
-
B) I don't click through to anything on Faux News :mad2: -
B) No problem. To each their own. -
"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against the tyranny in government."
-Thomas Jefferson
"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretence, raised in the United States. A military force, at the command of Congress, can execute no laws, but such as the people perceive to be just and constitutional; for they will possess the power, and jealousy will instantly inspire the inclination, to resist the execution of a law which appears to them unjust and oppressive."
Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution (Philadelphia 1787). NOTE: In 1783, Noah Webster produced the first American Dictionary.
UMMMMM....:rolleyes5: -
I don't care! I will let them copy my Drivers Licence, its not like I am a criminal or something? I do not see what the problem is with this, unless you are engaged in some type of criminal activity? Just like I when did I not care when they put my licence in some database at WalMart when I buy Sudafed and since I am NOT buying it for METH production, I don't mind that my licence is photocopied since I am NOT engaged in some shady business. But if I was some street criminal I would be up in arms about this.
Page 3 of 5