Oh, and check this out...
How to Become a Bounty Hunter | eHow.com
Only some states require licensing to be a bounty hunter. Other states all you have to do is print up some business cards and buy some handcuffs!
Matt
Page 4 of 4
-
-
goaljnky New Member
-
-
goaljnky New Member
-
-
goaljnky New Member
I see. So what is the acceptable error rate for you? 90%? 75%? How about if they get it right 51% of the time? That's still mostly right, isn't it? It is nice to see someone so nonchalant about my rights.
I could do some searching and post some relevant quotes from some long dead patriotic types about the need to protect one's liberties and rights at all costs, but I have a feeling the point would be missed. -
I think this has reached a point were certain parties do not agree and there is nothing either can say that will shed more light on this.
Many of us disagree with the state, or in the case of TX, local municipalities, changing statutes to suit the ability of 3rd party for profit entities to extract revenue from the citizens for minor infractions with automated processes. It starts with a red light camera, where does this end. Timing between lights to determine avg speed? How about checking the effluent of homes against a data base of prescribed drugs in the household to look for potential drug offenses.
The bottom line is we are giving up more and more of freedoms to people that are proving time and time again they are not capable. Our local, regional and federal offices are filled with elected officials that for the most part are in it for the money and power. Until we can get back to the point where we are "of the people, by the people, for the people" instead of this us vs. them mentality we are going to be royally screwed. -
lotsie Club Coordinator
Maybe it's time for a rousing M/A rendition of Kum Bay Yah:smilewinkgrin:
Mark -
goaljnky New Member
Hint taken. I thank Yellowbritishrocket and others like him for frighting to protect everyone's ability to have and voice an opinion.
-
-
goaljnky New Member
Well in that case... this just seemed appropriate:
-
While people contracted by the government to enforce laws might be incompetent, it is also possible that they would be fully competent. The only way this would affect constitutionality of the law itself would be if there were no way to enforce the law without violating constitutional rights.
This is why the argument that outside contractors tend to be incompetent does not make the law unconstitutional.
There are no RLC systems in my area. Either the officials here are too wise, or too lazy to go for them. If they were in my area, I would try to document whether the yellow duration had been reduced for RLC intersections. If they were not reduced, I would have no problem with there being RLC enforcement. Whether state employees were running the system, or it had been contracted out, would only concern me if it was handled badly. IMO, government employees can be every bit as poorly trained and incompetent as contracted services. It is the results that would matter.
If the yellow light durations had been reduced, I would do the research that shows this leads to an increase in rear-end collisions. With data to back me up, I would contact the agency responsible for the RLCs and try to make my point. If (as is likely) I made no progress with them, I could contact my local elected representitives and make the case. Then I would contact the local media and try to get them interested in the issue. If I could provide them with the material for a story, and the reason it would be of interest to readers, I suspect I could get them interested. I might put up a web page with the issues as well. Perhaps I'd go to an intersection with a particularly dangerous yellow duration and see if I could capture near miss accidents to show the reality of the problem.
The press is supposed to be the people's watchdog. One of their main purposes is to keep government honest. However, we as consumers of news have to provide the incentive for the press to do a good job. Lately, we have failed in this duty. We, as consumers, seem to be more interested in watching pundits tell us what we want to hear, rather than demanding high quality investigative journalism. Pundits are far cheaper than investigative journalism. So, instead of real news we get entertainment.
Without a serious press, politicians are not watched for the quality of job they do, but for sound bites that pundits can distort to make their shows interesting.
In the end, this is our government. We get the government we deserve. The frustrating part is that there are so many of us that it seems impossible for an individual to make an impact. -
goaljnky New Member
I hate to keep disagreeing with you, but the press being a watchdog of the people is a mantra voiced by the reporters. The problem is, reporters don't own newspapers, or the radio and TV stations. Those are owned by corporations. The main goal of the press is to sell advertising and turn a profit when possible (which has been hard of late). The fact that events, news, sports are being covered is secondary.
I know this by virtue of working for the second biggest news paper in the second biggest market in the nation. -
-
lotsie Club Coordinator
Speaking of the media, I just heard Micheal Jackson may have died
Mark -
-
Very sad day, even the House led by Pelosi had a minute of silence in honor of this grest American hero......... But didn't say a word about the 6 soldiers killed that day defending their right to do it.
-
-
-
goaljnky New Member
Page 4 of 4