I wish the local Mini dealers were that supportive of the enthusiasts. Here it's "Got mods? Pay extra or go away!"
Mat
Page 1 of 2
-
-
I had similar issues getting Pilot Racing studs out of my car, if it's any consolation. it's just impossible to get any torque on a 5mm allen without stripping it.
Robogrips are your friend here (as is tapping them inboard with a hammer to break up any corrosion). -
I have a couple questions because I have a similar rear setup, 11.75 Wilwoods with 14-12 studs, and hope I am not going to have issues when it is time to replace the rotors.
1. Why didn't you just get replacement Wilwood rotors? I think the replacement Wilwood rotors are a little cheaper than the TSW rotors? Where you experiencing a problem with the wilwoods? Were you going to replace the hats and rotors, so it made it more expensive? If so, why did you need to replace the hats?
2. Why did you need to remove the studs to replace the rotors? Couldn't you just remove the caliper and slide the rotor off the studs. I installed the 11.75" Wilwood rotors with the studs already installed so I hope I can get them off. Did you have some type off unusual problem that made it hard to remove the rotors? -
Going forward to replace the rotor I'll still have to remove the caliper and carrier but without the extension in place for the larger rotor I can just remove the 2 13mm bolts holding the carrier to the trailing arm. The OEM type setup does not have nuts on the bolts. -
I have a GP so I also have the R56 aluminum trailing arms. I had the studs already installed when I added the Wilwood rotors. I was able to install the rotor, carrier with dog bone, and caliper with the studs installed. Thus, I believe I should be able to remove the rotor with the studs in place. Maybe I installed mine slightly differently but I can not imagine how. I did have to grind some of the trailing arm to provide clearance for the button head bolts. I will have to unbolt the carrier with dog bone (as a complete assembly) from the arm to get the rotor off but there is no problem getting to those bolts because they are in the same location as stock. -
On my application there were two nuts on the front side of the trailing arm that would just spin in place when trying to unbolt the carrier and dog bone assembly. If we could have held the nuts in place the studs would not have to be removed. The bolts are in same location as stock, but those darn nuts on the front side were the problem we ran into.
I too had to do bit a grinding on the trailing arms to provide clearance for the button head bolts. -
Thanks Nathan. That makes sense.
I do not remember having a problem holding the bolt head and torquing the nuts (or holding the nut and torquing the bolt head). Maybe I installed the bolt/nut backwards from you. Maybe I was able to torque without holding the nut but that might not be the case when I want to remove the bolt. Now I am curious and will need to jack the car up next weekend and take a look at my install to see if I will have a similar problem that I should plan for. -
Steve AdministratorStaff Member Articles Moderator
I'm guessing there's no loss at all. The Wilwood kit uses stock calipers so should produce the same sort of braking as the stockers. As Nathan said in his first post the only real point of the larger diam rear rotors is to balance the look front to back...particularly when you switch to larger than stock front rotors. If you don't gain (functionally) by switching to the Wilwood kit, you don't lose by switching back.
-
I added the larger Wilwood rear brakes not to gain braking power but to help reduce the heat and disapate the heat generated by the small pads. Many people have measured very high temps on the rear brakes which can cause fluid to boil.
-
I'm pretty sure
that it's close to none. There's huge weight transfer to the fronts with such a short wheel base and relatively high center of gravity under heavy breaking.
Matt -
So far I've noticed no difference. I've also only driven about 100 miles if that much since the swap with no track work. However, both Alan and myself used some heat sensing paint on both the fronts and rears. At the time he was using the TSW OEM type rear and I was on the 11.7" Wilwood. Our temps fell in a similar range. I really do not expect and degradation in performance as there was no real gain in moving to the larger rotor. As I've stated, I went with that larger rotor at the time solely for the look.
-
After adding the TSW BDM I get about double the life of rear pads. In other words the more work the front brakes do, the less you need the rears.
Alan -
Sounds like a fun day. Glad to learn that the rear kit doesn't provide any significant benefit.
-
I did not do before and after braking distance testing but I would not expect the BBK to decrease braking distances (at least until the stock brakes start to fade). I added the BBK to provide better braking capability over sustained high heat braking activities, such as track days. The intent of the BBK is to help dissipate the heat (across larger rotors) to help the brake pads and fluid stay cooler so you do not have brake fade.
It is difficult to do a comparison between stock and BBK because most people (including me) use a different pad compound with the BBK. Even the different Mini Models/Options use different pad compounds. For me, I think my braking distances are a little longer with the BBK when the brakes are cold. I use Hawk HPS for the street and Wilwood B for the track. The Hawk HPS do not seem to have much initial bite compared to the stock TRW pads (on my GP) especially when a little cold. -
-
-
All calipers flex. Some more than others. Just seeing a caliper flex while bleeding doesn't mean much by itself. If it was flexing enough to cause uneven pad wear or odd breaking characteristics, then you are onto a potential reason for changing them out. Also, Wilwood (and most caliper manufacturers) has various different types of calipers - some more street oriented and some more track oriented. Each will behave differently in flex and other attributes.
Page 1 of 2