lol, dude you're quick. I was just about to post this myself and I figured I'd check first. Should've posted first and read second![]()
-
-
Here's the key detail from motoringfile.com:
-
I would hope the addition of the JCW Aero Kit helps sales of the JCW model, but IMO the biggest problem is the base price. MINI has priced themselves out of contention in the past few years. :frown5: The best thing they could do is slice a couple grand off the price and add the JCW Aero Kit.
$0.02,
Ryan -
:yesnod:what he said
-
BINGO!!!
While the new JCW is sweet, it's price is not and puts it in the range of some other very nice cars... The R53 JCW was a deal in comparison.... -
And how about this in the article's Comments section. :lol:
-
Jason Montague New MemberLifetime Supporter
New JCW
Jason
-
I'm hoping that I over looked some comment about the suspension and that little nugget of info will be disclosed at a later date. I like to think MINI listens to the community. Probably a bit more to the comments made on this forum or motoringfile when it comes to the JCW.
Sidenote: Look at the comments on the article. They don't even get 5 comments deep before somebody says something negative and the negative comments throughout the thread are the most conclusory. Nobody knows anything at this point, aside from the projected engine numbers provided by MINI, yet nay-sayers are pretty sure it'll stink.
Sorry for the rant, I don't mind speculation but negative know-it-all's bother me. -
Hey Dude, I am glad I gave you a laugh:skep:
I am sure I am not the only one who figured that the M7 diffuser and the Challenge spec. were one and the same... -
The M7 bits... (image is direct from M7 site)
MINI Challenge bits...
There are fundamental differences in the design. Note how the M7 bits have what looks like a small wing between the two, this is absent on the Challenge car. Also look the treatment around the exhaust of each. M7's has a smooth curve where the Challenge units take advantage of the space with that arrow head shaped area above the tips.
Lastly, Peter of M7 is very good at promotions, don't you think that if MINI was using the M7 bits that Peter would be touting that very fact. I know I would be shouting from the rooftop if MINI picked up a part I designed for a Challenge car. Not that I design parts...
So while the concept is similar the execution is quite different. -
Let's put the rear diffuser question to rest.
The MINI Challenge car was announced in early summer 2007 and photos were released in August 2007: http://www.motoringfile.com/2007/08/14/mini-releases-details-of-the-jcw-challenge-race-car/. Around that time, I'm not sure that M7 was shipping any product for the R56. They did announce an R56 Unichip was coming soon: http://www.northamericanmotoring.com/forums/vendor-announcements/111887-m7-new-r56-tuning-solutions.html
The next year in June 2008, M7 previewed their rear diffusor: http://www.northamericanmotoring.com/forums/interior-exterior/142542-m7-challenge-wing-and-diffuser-new.html. The MINI Challenge cars had already been shipping for some time and the race series already in progress. Any chance that M7 found some "inspiration" from somewhere? And there was this statement: -
Rixter Well-Known Member
MINI (Canada) is definitely not 'listening to the community'.
Sorry for my rant and I'm not intending on hyjacking this thread either. -
I know I learned something, and I hope others did too... -
-
Rixter, very valid points. Maybe it's a BMW thing, I know people who complain about the HPFP issues and BMW's lack of action. I'm sure there are countless issues with most car makers. However, I was speaking more towards MINI listening to the enthusiast community, more frequently than other car makers when they're looking to make their products more appealing, and then taking those suggestions under advisement.
-
Rixter Well-Known Member