2nd Gen R56 Cooper S Most liked posts in thread: The 'Carbon' Problem...

  1. Rixter

    Rixter Well-Known Member

    Jun 14, 2009
    1,230
    79
    48
    Technology Architect
    North of the 49th
    Ratings:
    +79 / 0 / -0
    I'm 3.5 years into my warranty. Performance seems to be off a bit, I'm hoping to get some sort of test done to see if I need this done while its under warrenty. What kind of test would be most indicative of carbon buildup, besides the butt dyno :rolleyes:
     
  2. Metalman

    Metalman Well-Known Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    Sep 29, 2009
    12,731
    7,688
    113
    Ex-Owner (Retired) of a custom metal fab company.
    Columbus, Ohio
    Ratings:
    +7,960 / 1 / -0
    In the video, the hose attachment with the aluminum piece that's shaped like a banana is just the pickup that removes the walnut shells that knock the carbon buildup off the intake valves. The small curved tool passes through the pickup and delivers the shells to the valves (aka sandblasting, but much gentler). He's working the tool around in an attempt to get all the angle he can to knock the carbon off all the sides and back of the valve stem.

    You can still have good compression even with carbon buildup on the valves. The carbon buildup impedes flow acting like a restrictor to the air entering the cylinder.

    No, I haven't had this done yet as my current mileage is only 12k.
     
  3. Metalman

    Metalman Well-Known Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    Sep 29, 2009
    12,731
    7,688
    113
    Ex-Owner (Retired) of a custom metal fab company.
    Columbus, Ohio
    Ratings:
    +7,960 / 1 / -0
    Generally a sense that there is a reduction in performance. In really bad cases a cel may get thrown. It kind of depends how cooperative your dealer is. Just rushing in complaining about lack of power may not convince them. It needs to be obvious. They do need to pull the intake track and use a borescope to inspect the valve stems for the carbon buildup. They will always find some carbon buildup. But the excessive buildup is what restricts the flow.
     
  4. Crashton

    Crashton Club Coordinator

    Jun 4, 2009
    19,445
    10,057
    113
    Retired old fart
    Hooterville Ohio USA
    Ratings:
    +11,698 / 2 / -0
    I'm thinking if that carbon gets bad enough it could cause the valves to not seat correctly leading to burned valves. Although with these cars having the diagnostics they do I'm sure all kinds of bells & whistles would be sounding. In the old days we drove them till they dropped. Cars have gotten so much better over the years.
     
  5. Metalman

    Metalman Well-Known Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    Sep 29, 2009
    12,731
    7,688
    113
    Ex-Owner (Retired) of a custom metal fab company.
    Columbus, Ohio
    Ratings:
    +7,960 / 1 / -0
    Yep, it's all a matter of degree. It's a progressive change. Goes from good to bad. Those with a R56S are all somewhere on this timeline. That is, until the timeline is reset with some kind of maintenance. BMW / MINI did make an upgrade to the valve cover that has a different PCV maze to improve oil vapor containment at the 11-2008 through 3-2010 S model N14 engine (11127572854 OLD P/N.....11127585907 NEW P/N), until the introduction of the N18 engine. The N18 engine further changes the PCV routing with only one PCV hose leading to the turbo cold side. The fJCW soldiers on with the dual hose valve cover.....
     
  6. SMOG

    SMOG ZOOOOOMMMM
    Lifetime Supporter

    Nov 28, 2009
    164
    21
    0
    Retired, twice...
    Port Orchard, Washington
    Ratings:
    +21 / 0 / -0
    After 7300 miles on the N18 engine I pulled the intercooler to put a larger one on. No residue of oil in it or the hot and cold side tubes going to it, clean as a whistle!
     
  7. Crashton

    Crashton Club Coordinator

    Jun 4, 2009
    19,445
    10,057
    113
    Retired old fart
    Hooterville Ohio USA
    Ratings:
    +11,698 / 2 / -0
    I'm very happy you guys & MINI are figuring this stuff out. By the time I get an R56 this should all be well documented & no big deal.
     
  8. Crashton

    Crashton Club Coordinator

    Jun 4, 2009
    19,445
    10,057
    113
    Retired old fart
    Hooterville Ohio USA
    Ratings:
    +11,698 / 2 / -0
    ^ wow!!! :eek6:
     
  9. Jason Montague

    Jason Montague New Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    Jan 5, 2010
    6,134
    1,588
    0
    Physician Assitant (retired)
    Sherman,Tx
    Ratings:
    +1,588 / 0 / -0
    #125 Jason Montague, Apr 29, 2012
    Last edited: Apr 29, 2012
    :cornut: Seafoam! Seafoam! Seafoam! every 3kmi and NOT just in the gas tank which by passes the intake valves. Also an O.C.C. keeps all of that carp off of the intake valves in the first place.:Thumbsup:

    Jason
     
  10. hbSean

    hbSean New Member

    May 1, 2011
    16
    0
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Maybe I should buy a Walnut blaster from BMW if I were to keep my car. :idea:
     
  11. Rixter

    Rixter Well-Known Member

    Jun 14, 2009
    1,230
    79
    48
    Technology Architect
    North of the 49th
    Ratings:
    +79 / 0 / -0
    Chuck, I'm not getting any CELs', maybe the only thing I'm getting is a case of paranoia. I have to stop reading these threads. Nevertheless, thanks for putting my mind at ease, for now :cornut:
     
  12. Jason Montague

    Jason Montague New Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    Jan 5, 2010
    6,134
    1,588
    0
    Physician Assitant (retired)
    Sherman,Tx
    Ratings:
    +1,588 / 0 / -0
    #129 Jason Montague, Apr 30, 2012
    Last edited: Apr 30, 2012
    :cornut: (just me) I did this while in warranty and Mini of Dallas never even blinked. They called over the other techs and said,"Hey! Look at this. Pretty cool huh?" My OCC is the BSH with BSH boost tap that I got on sale from our very own Defenders Of Speed(GOOD PEOPLE) right here on MA. People have done work on dual OCCs. Check the threads on OCCs here on MA. The main problem with dual OCC is that they require space that's unavailable under our bonnets. BSH OCC with Boost Tap catches every thing and still lets the PCV system work properly(on Margi 08 R56 MCS/JCWm there are 2 avenues of PCV. 1 direct from the crank case to the head and 2 from the crank case through the head to the turbo intake). Margi's BSH system has been on now >20kmi and at 48kmi she blew a head gasket which allowed me to see the intake valves, clean as a whistle. Every ~200mi, I empty her OCC of 2-3oz Blow By Dinosaur Snow that won't get to her intake valves.:Thumbsup:

    Jason
     
  13. grodenglaive

    grodenglaive New Member

    Apr 3, 2010
    313
    68
    0
    Ottawa, Ontario
    Ratings:
    +68 / 0 / -0
    what happened to the head gasket?
     
  14. Metalman

    Metalman Well-Known Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    Sep 29, 2009
    12,731
    7,688
    113
    Ex-Owner (Retired) of a custom metal fab company.
    Columbus, Ohio
    Ratings:
    +7,960 / 1 / -0
    Here is a good thread from the BMW forum on the walnut cleaning process. Be aware, there are two "suction" tools. If you intend to go this route, get the MINI specific tool.
    [ame=http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=682116]REVIEW: Cleaning of intake valves with BMW walnut shell blasting tool - BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum - E90Post.com[/ame]

    Similar process, just a different engine.....
     
  15. Jason Montague

    Jason Montague New Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    Jan 5, 2010
    6,134
    1,588
    0
    Physician Assitant (retired)
    Sherman,Tx
    Ratings:
    +1,588 / 0 / -0
    :cornut: The smart a$$ answer would be,"they put a new one in and trashed the old one.":lol: This however is MA and we don't tolerate that so:cornut:............. They couldn't identify the cause. They checked the head for warping,negative. Coincidental or not, they found that the 2 temp thermostat was out and replaced it. 1 kmi later(just over the 50kmi warranty) the water pump went out, replaced it. Now 15kmi later, all okay. :Thumbsup:

    Jason
     
  16. Redbeard

    Redbeard JCW: because fast is fun!
    Supporting Member

    Dec 17, 2009
    1,636
    398
    83
    Glorified spreadsheet jockey.
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +413 / 0 / -0
    As stated before: I had mine done at 60k miles with only mild build-up. I didn't notice any issues before. Afterwards I have see a 2mpg improvement in mileage and better throttle response.

    Jason, I'm glad you are happy with the Seafoam treatment but I have yet to see any documented evidence that shows it really works in STOPPING build-up. If you have the time I'd love to get some pictures of what your valves look like. Until then I'm not willing to say that Seafoam is the "cure". It certainly helps though.

    As above the "chemical treatment" doesn't show any real signs of absolute removal of the carbon build-up.

    The cleaning process requires that the intake manifold be removed and the intake and back-sides of the valves are cleaned manually or with the BMW walnut method. The head does not need to be removed.
     
  17. Thumper460

    Thumper460 Active Member

    May 26, 2009
    559
    94
    28
    United States Navy ..Retired
    Ratings:
    +99 / 0 / -0
    Thanks y'all..

    Thumper
     
  18. Jason Montague

    Jason Montague New Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    Jan 5, 2010
    6,134
    1,588
    0
    Physician Assitant (retired)
    Sherman,Tx
    Ratings:
    +1,588 / 0 / -0
    :cornut:I guess that(as usual) my fingers can't type what my mind is trying to say. I use Seafoam and have the BSH OCC with BSH tap. Some thousands of miles after installing/beginning 3kmi use THEN, she had her head gasket changed and at that time was when I saw CLEAN intake valves/stems. If I had had a camera phone at that time then, I could have shown photos but, I didn't and I can't. There, clear as mud? SEAFOAM and OCC(Not Seafoam OR OCC) are PREVENTATIVE and not THERAPEUTIC!!!!!!!!!!!

    Jason
     
  19. mini52

    mini52 New Member

    May 7, 2010
    7
    0
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    #138 mini52, Jun 5, 2012
    Last edited: Jun 5, 2012
    Sorry for the delay, the dealer only said the valves were very black. The dealer also did a software update that he said would help reduce (not eliminate) the carbon buildup. Last week a local mechanic suggested (as several here have) that I start using a "Seafoam" equivalent every 3000 miles.

    Edit: I would also like to add that my oil consumption is way down from what it was. I don't know why and neither did the local mechanic. I wish I thought of asking to see the valve condition.
     
  20. Redbeard

    Redbeard JCW: because fast is fun!
    Supporting Member

    Dec 17, 2009
    1,636
    398
    83
    Glorified spreadsheet jockey.
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +413 / 0 / -0
    Info update: My Dad has a 2008 MCSa. He just got his intake cleaned by the same dealer that did mine. They took pics (which I am waiting on). According to the tech they valves were all about a 7 on thier scale.

    My Dad has a short commute to work (5.2 miles) and doesn't get the car up to temp for extended periods of time. No track days and no autocrosses either. ;)

    After two tanks for gas he is telling me that he has a 4-5 mpg improvement in gas mileage and the oil consumption issue he was seeing is much better. He was adding a half quart every 3k miles. Hasn't seen the level drop yet but it's too early to make a final call on that.