3rd Gen JCW Most liked posts in thread: The Differences: F56 JCW vs. Cooper S

  1. cct1

    cct1 Well-Known Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    May 5, 2009
    3,378
    3,368
    113
    Ratings:
    +3,369 / 0 / -0
    The 2014 figures are artificially low too, due to recalls.

    I'm not an F56 fan, but Ryan and Nate are right, it's here to stay. And I'm guessing that there are still a few enthusiasts in the F56 crowd, maybe not as high a percentage, but there are still some just as enthusiastic as we are. Let 'me join in. We grudgingly accepted the R56 crowd way back when, and that ended up turning out pretty well. For the most part....:)

    F56 bashing was funny for awhile, but people are just tired of it, it's like watching too many Adam Sandler movies in a row--juvenile fun at first, Chinese water torture by the end.

    When it gets to the point that we're taking people as enthusiastic as we are and taking the fun out of it for them, it's time to take a step back.
     
  2. cct1

    cct1 Well-Known Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    May 5, 2009
    3,378
    3,368
    113
    Ratings:
    +3,369 / 0 / -0
    You have to remember, the first generation was a one-off. It wasn't done for profit, hence the relatively small numbers.Things like the water molded bonnet were expensive (and won't be seen again); the first generation was a labor of love. When it was greeted with more enthusiasm than what was initially anticipated, BMW realized they had an opportunity to make a decent profit, and the 2nd generation on, the car has to be profitable to survive. The first generation wasn't under that microscope; there weren't plans for a second generation, it was only after the 1st generation exploded that BMW figured they had something here...

    BMW makes money off of options; that's why MINI has become a "luxury" small car; that's where the money is. Stripped, bare bones performance models don't generate profit margins. The GP works because they keep the numbers way down, at least they still try to throw us a bone.
     
  3. Ryephile

    Ryephile New Member

    Apr 9, 2009
    299
    122
    0
    Yes!
    Metro Detroit
    Ratings:
    +122 / 0 / -0
    You guys will get a kick out of this. It's a graph charting the force delivered to the tires contact patch on both the Cooper S and the JCW. This highlights the notable difference in torque output from the engine, but also how gearing affects the torque to the ground along with speed ranges in each gear.

    Since the entire drivetrain is usually an underdrive, even in top-gear, torque is multiplied. In 1st gear, the JCW's 15.0:1 total ratio multiplies the engine's 236 LbFt and [in conjunction with the torque radius of the loaded tire] transfers 3,616 Lbf to the pavement from 6 to 22 MPH in 1st gear at full load. This is a huge amount, way more than most small cars I've owned. As perspective, a Subaru BRZ only puts down about 2,100 Lbf in 1st gear, a Fiat Abarth 500 puts down about 2,500 Lbf in 1st gear, and some of you might remember my white Lotus Exige S, puts down about 2,430 Lbf peak in 1st gear. This means that despite the Cooper S having excellent 1st gear torque, the JCW will positively ROAST the tires to oblivion. :lol:

    The JCW's super-overdrive 6th gear means it'll feel fairly average in terms of top-gear acceleration, but also at 70 MPH the engine will only be casually turning at 2,404 RPM, compared to the Cooper S's 2,716 RPM at the same speed.

    [​IMG]16970683377_da9097e92b_o.jpg by Ryephile, on Flickr
     
  4. Dave.0

    Dave.0 Helix & RMW Powered
    Lifetime Supporter

    May 4, 2009
    25,021
    13,497
    113
    Burbs of Philly, PA
    Ratings:
    +14,644 / 10 / -4
    Still can't fix ugly.....
     
  5. Nathan

    Nathan Founder

    Mar 30, 2009
    25,144
    10,052
    113
    Writer
    Short North
    Ratings:
    +10,069 / 0 / -0
    That would be a Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate (SAAR) of ~68,000 at the current pace.

    The cars are selling.

    M/A is inclusive. If you can't be, there are other places for you.

    Now back to the Ryephile discussion on the F56 model differences.
     
  6. Zillon

    Zillon Well-Known Member

    Jul 12, 2014
    702
    632
    93
    Central NJ
    Ratings:
    +633 / 0 / -0
    Because most drivers don't give two shits about cars. They just want something that gets them from point A to point B without spilling their coffee. :mad2:
     
  7. rkw

    rkw Well-Known Member

    May 7, 2009
    1,253
    443
    83
    San Francisco
    Ratings:
    +449 / 0 / -0
    Detuned to leave room for the GP? Nah, they wouldn't do anything like that.

    And what's with this "active tourer" nonsense? Let's call it the station wagon that it is.
     
  8. GokartPilot

    GokartPilot Well-Known Member

    Jan 9, 2012
    967
    727
    93
    training specialist
    Maysville, North Carolina USA
    Ratings:
    +793 / 0 / -0
    ^^Agree^^ I am not a big fan of the F56 but hey, it’s good to see people driving around in MINIs whatever they happen to be.
    There is something to be said about the newer MINIs that are hitting the streets though; they are actually on the road. I bet if there was a survey you would find that most are daily drivers, not parked for the occasional sunny weekend drive, MINI event or making track cars out of them. They are getting groceries, picking up the kids from school and going to work in them every day.
    I get asked at least once a week how I like my MINI, I can honestly say every time I answer that question I have a big smile on my face and tell them that it is the most fun car to drive that I have ever owned. The next question is how is the gas mileage? Uhmm? Thinking about it I might be at fault for helping with the increase in MINI sales.
    I guess the byproduct of these sale “increases” could lead to bigger and “better” things, maybe the fruition of the Rocketman or Supereleggera. I guarantee if that happens I will be visiting a MINI dealership taking a few test drives.
     
  9. BlimeyCabrio

    BlimeyCabrio Oscar Goldman of MINIs
    Lifetime Supporter

    May 4, 2009
    3,532
    2,896
    113
    Professional Facilitator and Alignment Consultant
    Holly Springs, NC
    Ratings:
    +2,896 / 0 / -0
    And, while it pains me to say it... MINI sold more 2nd and 3rd gen cars in 2014 than they did 1st gen cars in 2006. By far.

    Ryan, this is GREAT stuff. Thanks for all the work putting it together.
     
  10. Zillon

    Zillon Well-Known Member

    Jul 12, 2014
    702
    632
    93
    Central NJ
    Ratings:
    +633 / 0 / -0
    I'm coming around to the F56 - I still don't like the massive underbite of the front bumper, though.

    Reminds me of this:
    [​IMG]

    I'd love to see a base Cooper bumper on a F56S.
     
  11. cct1

    cct1 Well-Known Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    May 5, 2009
    3,378
    3,368
    113
    Ratings:
    +3,369 / 0 / -0
    What's your track toy now? You gotta have something! I thought you sold the Lotus--did you get another one?
     
  12. wmwny

    wmwny Well-Known Member

    May 29, 2009
    4,048
    2,246
    113
    Male
    Retired
    Piqua, Ohio
    Ratings:
    +2,810 / 10 / -0
    Welcome back, Ryan. We don't see you much anymore.
     
  13. Ryephile

    Ryephile New Member

    Apr 9, 2009
    299
    122
    0
    Yes!
    Metro Detroit
    Ratings:
    +122 / 0 / -0
    #11 Ryephile, May 5, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: May 5, 2015
    :deadhorse:

    Nathan and I were talking about how there were an incredible amount of F56's at MOTD this year. Whether you think they look good or not is irrelevant; they're here to stay. Car manufacture is about making money, not appealing to enthusiasts, however tough a pill that is to swallow. If enough people agreed with you then the platform would be a failure, however at this point the sales figures don't agree with you.
     
  14. BlimeyCabrio

    BlimeyCabrio Oscar Goldman of MINIs
    Lifetime Supporter

    May 4, 2009
    3,532
    2,896
    113
    Professional Facilitator and Alignment Consultant
    Holly Springs, NC
    Ratings:
    +2,896 / 0 / -0
    I kinda like my immature exhaust. :cornut:
     
  15. Zillon

    Zillon Well-Known Member

    Jul 12, 2014
    702
    632
    93
    Central NJ
    Ratings:
    +633 / 0 / -0
    The only thing that worries me about BMW's future business decisions, and I shared this thought with others, is that BMW is trying to push MINI into a volume brand... and that will be the downfall of the brand.

    Even the brand reps present at MOTD agreed - chasing numbers for the sake of numbers alone will take the MINI out of MINI.

    There's also no reason to bloat the cars with excess weight and insulation. Keep them small, light, and sure, offer luxury options/packages, but allow us to still purchase performance-focused models.

    I do love this thread, though - it's great to see the differences between the regular F56S and the JCW.
     
  16. GokartPilot

    GokartPilot Well-Known Member

    Jan 9, 2012
    967
    727
    93
    training specialist
    Maysville, North Carolina USA
    Ratings:
    +793 / 0 / -0
    I also found those numbers a little surprising. For a year that most, if not all of the bugs had been worked out and most MINI enthusiasts (me included) consider the benchmark, there are not to many of them on the road. I guess just another reason to hold on to mine and add a second to the stable. :Thumbsup:

    Thanks for all the knowledge gents.
     
  17. cct1

    cct1 Well-Known Member
    Lifetime Supporter

    May 5, 2009
    3,378
    3,368
    113
    Ratings:
    +3,369 / 0 / -0
    But that's the thing, the new MINI wasn't started for profit. It was a one off labor of love brand recognition thing, there were never plans for a gen2, that was up in the air until the end of the gen1 lifecycle.

    I agree with you, keeping the size down should have been a priority, but BMW went where they thought the market was, and it sort of left many of us gen1 lovers behind. It is what it is.

    I'm really hoping the Rocketman makes it out, and I'll be very interested to see how it's received, and how it sells.

    As for the newest Miata, they bucked the trend and made it smaller and lighter....Sigh.....
     
  18. Dave.0

    Dave.0 Helix & RMW Powered
    Lifetime Supporter

    May 4, 2009
    25,021
    13,497
    113
    Burbs of Philly, PA
    Ratings:
    +14,644 / 10 / -4
    Well we all knew it would not make it to production. Why, because it was small and what people wanted.

    BMW is now working on the new 6 door MINI Countryman Excursion. :lol:
     
  19. Ryephile

    Ryephile New Member

    Apr 9, 2009
    299
    122
    0
    Yes!
    Metro Detroit
    Ratings:
    +122 / 0 / -0
    Some other things worth noting:


    *If you equip a Cooper S with the JCW Aero kit, the coefficient of drag and thus total drag numbers will likely mirror the JCW model, and as such it can be inferred that highway fuel economy will suffer slightly.

    *The JCW will most likely get equivalent, or only slightly less highway FE than the standard-body-kit Cooper S. This is a speculation on my part, deduced from the taller 5th and 6th gears, so the engine will be operating at a lower RPM for the same speed versus the Cooper S. So, the lower engine speed usually means improved FE, but the higher aero drag means it'll wash out. Based on my knowledge of EPA FE testing, MINIUSA very likely did not push the ECU calibrators as hard to perfect the JCW's highway number, knowing the figure is not as important as the high volume selling Cooper and S for CAFE and also because the target demographic isn't as concerned with the FE numbers.

    *Sifting through BMW press releases, I found the BMW 218d Active Tourer, which is a platform mate to the F55/F56, has the exact same ratios for its 6-speed manual except for the final drive ratio. This means BMW already has most of the JCW-manual in production, just not the final drive gears. Regarding the JCW Automatic, it appears to be identical to the 218i Active Tourer's 6-speed automatic with the exception of the final drive.

    *The JCW's engine compression ratio of 10.2:1 is identical to the BMW 225i Active Tourer's, meaning it's entirely likely the engine would have no problem matching its 350 Nm (258 LbFt) peak torque at 1,250 RPM, and peak power of 231 HP from 4750 to 6000 RPM, given the appropriate ECU tune.

    *It's entirely likely cooperative dealership parts departments, or aftermarket vendors, will generate a kit to retrofit the JCW oil cooler onto a Cooper S. I see this as a valuable addition for those that HPDE/track-day their Cooper S.

    *More research is needed into the part numbers for the suspension pieces in the JCW. It'll be interesting to see how different the front knuckles are. Also if the verbiage in the press release talking about the rear suspension having "a larger proportion of highly rigid steel types" is just marketing gloss or if the rear lateral control arms are indeed unique.

    *The wheels on the JCW allegedly are different part numbers than the JCW wheels offered on the Exterior Packages for the Cooper and Cooper S, though I don't have those numbers just yet.

    Anyone else have insight into the specifics of the JCW that I missed?
     
  20. Ryephile

    Ryephile New Member

    Apr 9, 2009
    299
    122
    0
    Yes!
    Metro Detroit
    Ratings:
    +122 / 0 / -0
    I have a turbo 1st gen Miata as a project/restoration. You might've seen it at MOTD this past weekend. :biggrin5:

    Thanks :) I still love the MINI community and I've learned a LOT in the past few years in other marques that hopefully can translate here.

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------

    RealOEM.com just updated and now has the early JCW builds. Here are some of the changes:

    *The engine for the JCW is called B48A20B, whereas the Cooper S is called B46A20A
    *Piston is now #11258618503
    *The cylinder head, cams, valves, and springs are identical to the Cooper S
    *The turbocharger/exhaust manifold is listed as the same part number. hmmmm.

    *Manual trans flywheel is #21208600213 (auto trans flexplate is the same)
    *The clutch is #21208631870, and has a note of being 228mm, likely the diameter.
    *The manual trans is #23008617543 and called GS6-59SG - TBFN, the last letter being different than the Cooper S
    *The automatic trans has a few part numbers depending on options, but they're all different than the Cooper S



    *The Radiator is now #17118603089 and the Intercooler is now #17517617600. It'll be interesting to see what the functional differences are vs. the Cooper S.
    *The exhaust downpipe [#18327634633] is the same as the B48 Cooper S. The B46 engine uses a different part number.
    *The center muffler is now # 18308616390, and the rear muffler is now # 18308615431


    RealOEM hasn't yet updated the front suspension part numbers for the JCW.
    *The rear suspension arms appear to be identical
    *The rear dampers and rear sway bar are identical to the Cooper S Sport Suspension, as promised.

    I missed something from the engine. The JCW injectors are listed as a different part number, but with a note that it's already "ended", with no new part number. Strange.

    Also, the charge air ducts to and from the Intercooler are new. Either improved airflow and/or different terminations to the Intercooler, given that's new too.

    The turbine and exhaust manifold are one casting on the F56, and the part number is listed as the same according to RealOEM at this time. Personally I think it makes sense in order to get the same 1,250 RPM boost threshold, but it is counter to the glossy verbiage in the press release.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------

    The Brakes are a big change!

    *The new Brembo front brakes are 4 piston fixed calipers using 2 bridge pins and a retainer spring to locate and quiet the front pads. The JCW pads appear to have much more volume and area than the Cooper S pads. This is good for brake torque and thermal capacity. The pads will also be very quick to change, meaning a swap from street to track compounds can be done quicker than the time it takes to unbolt the wheel.

    *The new rotors are 335 x 30mm, versus the Cooper S's 294 x 22mm. That's a big increase in both diameter and width.

    *The rear brake rotors are still 259 x 10mm, same as Cooper S, however the calipers and mounts are new part numbers, perhaps because they're painted red.

    *Given the much larger front brakes, it's not surprising the Master Cylinder is different [#34336868997]. The proportioning and/or bore size is likely changed to maintain hydraulic balance. Interestingly, the ABS servo is the same as Cooper S. The Vacuum booster aka Servo is also different, now #34336869016.

    *The wheel part numbers are still not updated.

    *The body skeleton is the same part number, meaning no fundamental changes to structure or strength.

    *Of course, the wheel arch plastics are new part numbers:
    51777387889 & 51777387890 front no PDC
    51777403264 & 51777403265 front w/PDC
    51777387893 & 51777387894 rear for both
    The rest of the black plastics appear to be the same as the JCW Exterior Pack on the Coopers S

    *The JCW emblem on the front grill is not listed as a separate part number, however there is a "chrome line" [#51137368129] and "Chili Red" [#51137393456] grille.

    *This page shows the air duct for the "AMOeK", let's see if we can figure out what that means. The oil cooler on the JCW is listed as identical to the Cooper S, so that doesn't appear to be it. A quickie Google shows that most current BMW's also have an "AMOeK", whatever that is. hmmm...

    The JCW seats are interesting. The headrest is fixed, but there's still a headrest restraint bar that's mounted the same way as the normal seats, it's just not adjustable due to the upholstery style.

    Check out the upholstery page here. All seats are mostly Dinamica [a brand name for a faux suede], and then either have cloth [standard] or leather [$1,950 option] trim. The Dinamica is black on the cloth trim, and red on the leather trim.

    The Chrono "paket" gauges are online. The gauges are #62109363125, the LHD bezels are #65509347442 & #65509347446.

    Finally, the A/C condenser is a new part number, likely as part of the new radiator and intercooler stack-up.



    Cheers,
    Ryan