Not the 2nd or 3rd gens either. Unless you buy a Justa and what fun it that. :lol:
If you want a car with great MPG and is ultra reliable buy a Hyundai or KIA.
Germany / England have nothing even close to the reliability of those cars and the MPG.
Page 2 of 2
-
Dave.0 Helix & RMW PoweredLifetime Supporter
-
BTW, I got a F56 loaner car recently with the 3-cilynder turbo, and it drove pretty nicely. It has the guppy-face and the ridiculously large taillights, but still looks better than a f-ing Hyundai.
CD -
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk -
-
TheModFather Well-Known Member
- May 15, 2012
- 5,310
- 11 years in the ARMY, 2 years of being a multitale
- Ratings:
- +5,322 / 0 / -0
MINI and fuel mileage? HA!!!
My R53 long ago when it was still stock in 2009 got about 25~26 MPG...
The Porker averaged out at 23~24 MPG which isn't bad for an AWD turbo car, and could've been better if I didn't always feel the need to wring every bit of power out of it...
Now, I have a Turbo 3.0L inline 6 that puts out 325 HP from the factory, and I'm averaging 24~25 MPG! [emoji23] Maybe it's because I don't feel the need to use all the horsepowers every time I drive it?
Standard start up sequence for the Porker was to totally disable the DSC system (Hold the Traction control button until "DSC OFF" shows up on the tach screen) and make sure to press the "Sport" button so the throttle and steering would tighten up and make it feel like a car instead of an appliance...
The BMW: Press the start button, put the transmission in it's regular "Drive" mode, and go! If I'm feeling like playing a little I put the trans into "Manual" and still hold off on the "Sport" button unless I'm really playing with it. Yes pressing the "Sport" button actually does something in the BMW rather than just make the car feel the way it should have been from the factory. [emoji2]
MINI has lost everything it had going for it... They took a great small car, that was originally more oriented to the performance enthusiast, and have dulled it down to a computer in a not so great looking box to suit the techie geek instead of keeping some focus on why most of us here originally fell in love with and bought into the brand.
I knew when the F-series was released that I would be looking elsewhere for my next car, even though I gave them one last chance with the R60. I am glad I had the Porker though, because it was an all around great car that had a lot of potential to be good at whatever you wanted to do with it. (except for its lack of being able to safely add any kind of real power due to the weak factory engine internals an un-tunable ECU) But I'm even happier that (even though it's broken again) I still have and will always have one of the best MINIs ever made, and don't buy into the techno crap the brand is pushing to the masses today.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
-
-
I hate turbos, I have always hated turbos ever sense I worked on Maseratis in the 80's. I do like the Gen2 minis not like I do my sweet Gen1 S. My wife R57 is a very nice car but I cringe when I think of that HOT turbo under the hood. I know you can wrap the turbo but thats just asking for trouble. I plan on getting the heat shield for the hood. Her hood scoop has some holes I may open it up some more.
But to the subject Mini has lost its way. But the Bangel Butt is a thing of the past for BMW perhaps this will soon pass to.
Long live the R53! -
-
DneprDave Well-Known MemberSupporting Member
Wrapping the turbo is not asking for trouble, it improves the efficiency of the turbocharger and helps protect the pedestal bearing and seals from the heat of the hot side of the turbo. If you want your turbocharger to last a long time, wrap that sucker!
-
Crashton Club Coordinator
Good looking Hyundai is an oxymoron. Those cars really need a 100,000 mile warranty to sell.
Wrapping a turbo or header can do good things like keep under-hood temps down. There is no free lunch holding that heat in is going to effect the parts you've wrapped.
Man Lee you worked on Masser Bi-turbos.... :frown2: Turbos have gotten better, but I understand your hate-tread of them. I was very surprised when you bought one.
I like the turbo on my GTI. Woosh...... -
-
And when i mention mpg's and MINI cars, it is to keep in mind WHAT the mini was sold as....
A economicall small car, that also had good performance. Even the gen1 S was, as a typical $25,000 car new with 25-30 mpg car not great, but competitive....sure folks got less, but as built, they could with the stock sized rims (16x6.5) be a reasonable commuter car that you could have fun on the weekends with.
Honestly, as a daily driver, and not as a 3rd hobby car, getting less that that unmodified would have been a no go...you gave up mpg's to get performance.
Today with most 4 dr sedans getting 38-40 mpg, and 2 dr coupe getting close to that or better depending on the performance, I as a realist, can say by the end of the gen1 cars, I knew some had to change...if you are going to run around in a small fun car, it's nice for it to be somewhat economical....
heck...I cringe when I see the ¢60-90 premium for high octane....it was once under ¢25 per gallon, but the spread is getting worse, and I know that the best octanes are getting phased out in some areas...Sunocco largely stopped selling 94 octane when they shut down their refinery in NJ, but 93 being common now....and 90 in some area.....as bio-fuels become more in demand, do stations drop midgrade or premium to sell e85? I hate the stuff, both economicly and on the premises of burning food, but it is becoming more common.....as us e-10, and e15....
Long live the r53....but the SC was favored for a few reasons in the gen1...time to get the motor to market, $$, and development time, and perhaps MINI's own history....
But at some point $$ overcomes "fun" in selling NEW cars, and I am happy I owned one of the last good SC cars made. Can I turn the clock back...nope...but I know many turbo's can run 500,000 on diesel trucks....usually 200,000 or more on a car when done right...sure...mini messed up with the CAT location on the gen2 cars....but turbos have come a LONG way from the old units from the 90's.....
So...before you complain about turbo life, how many Eaton sc have had the waterpump PTO fail ? Nothing is perfect. -
DneprDave Well-Known MemberSupporting Member
You are not going to cook the pedestal bearings if you wrap the hot side, they are water cooled and the turbocharger cooling system operates for a few minutes after the engine is shut down. Remember the electric cooling pump recall a few years ago? That was for the turbocharger cooling pump.
-
TheModFather Well-Known Member
- May 15, 2012
- 5,310
- 11 years in the ARMY, 2 years of being a multitale
- Ratings:
- +5,322 / 0 / -0
Modern turbos are way more advanced than even the ones made 10 years ago Lee, and the crud they made in the 80's might as well be chiseled out of stone! [emoji23]
There are turbos available now that don't even need an oil line ran to them...
Wrapping the hot side of the turbo is a good idea, and won't cause as much additional wear on the bearings as adding a 15% pulley does to an M45.
Wrapping the entire exhaust was actually on the list of mods I wanted to do to the Porker because it's a cheap way to gain a little more efficiency out of the system... Might have to carry that idea over to Grace, but not any time soon, getting the house and garage is my top priority, then it's finding a cheap and reliable small pickup to use as a daily when I get settled in at the Dragon. [emoji2]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
TheModFather Well-Known Member
- May 15, 2012
- 5,310
- 11 years in the ARMY, 2 years of being a multitale
- Ratings:
- +5,322 / 0 / -0
Funny you should say that... I would actually take my first MINI ('05 R50) back as a daily for that reason! But when I get where I'm going, a small pickup would fit the bill of what I actually need better, especially with the business plan. [emoji6]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Page 2 of 2