Most liked posts in thread: What If??? GP Content

Page 2 of 2
  1. TheModFather

    TheModFather Well-Known Member

    May 15, 2012
    6,023
    5,310
    113
    11 years in the ARMY, 2 years of being a multitale
    North Denver CO.
    Ratings:
    +5,322 / 0 / -0
    #22 TheModFather, Sep 1, 2016


    It would be a good aftermarket build, and something along those lines was what I had in mind for the Porker... However, with the aftermarket support on a decline because there aren't many ways to get inside the computer programing, and general loss of interest among people wanting to actually modify the cars to the extent we have with the R53's it doesn't make sense to do it... Which is one reason I jumped ship for a real BMW.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  2. TheModFather

    TheModFather Well-Known Member

    May 15, 2012
    6,023
    5,310
    113
    11 years in the ARMY, 2 years of being a multitale
    North Denver CO.
    Ratings:
    +5,322 / 0 / -0
    #23 TheModFather, Sep 1, 2016


    Agreed! Which is why Ford keeps Shelby separate from even the SVT division... Look at Chevy a few years back, EVERY model had an SS package and it ruined the SS image and nameplate.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  3. Qik

    Qik Well-Known Member

    Oct 27, 2015
    1,421
    670
    113
    IT
    Atlanta-ish
    Ratings:
    +811 / 0 / -0
    #24 Qik, Sep 1, 2016
    SO true. Gotta love it when a 2000's Monte Carlo says SS and it's not even supercharged. WHY?! What the hell is Super Sporty about a 3.8 liter naturally aspirated 2 door BOAT. Granted it was a good engine but they're a dam pooch when you get on the gas. Even in the 80's, a 305 in an SS Monte, they gotta be THEE slowest fast-ish looking car in the history of cars. A dam caprice wagon can smoke those things!
    -end rant
     
Page 2 of 2